Tim Nelson
Veteran
Very few remaining synergies that the company hasn't already tapped into regarding cross utilization for fleet. I think there are only 12 stations or so, including ORD. It's like one workforce up here. Doing a work bid for 60 employees is prolly negligible or just a small cost. That said, I support the cross utilization agreement.You had zero leverage.
The anti-trust suit had zero to do with your Negotiations and the majority of your workforce weren’t under a CBA.
The leverage we have is the synergies.
In Maintenance still can’t work each other’s metal in heavy maintenance.
And the IAM lack of a JCBA is holding up Parker’s and other executives bonus.
And they can’t do one bid and the like as none of the IAM and TWU workforce has been intergrated.
Still two totally different payroll and personnel departments.
There is no interim agreement signed off on. They only signed off on an interim wage increase.
Scope, Retirement, Wages, and Insurance are all still open items in negotiations
Nonetheless, there are some things that the company wanted and secured with a AIP. It wanted to mirror Delta and, now United in regards to eliminating caps/ratios, and it wanted LUS health care, small stations, and catering. It got LUS health care and loosened up the part time caps and scheduling. It didn't get lav or catering or small stations (not completely as they grandfathered). The wage was $32 but that was before Delta announced the return of full profit sharing once again.
For LUS, imo, this is a bad joke. We ultimately lose small stations, lose part time caps, lose LUS health care. Gain some extra days off, shift differ, a wage bump, overtime bypass, and extra 3 minutes of rest time. At best, it is cost neutral for LUS fleet, may actually be cost negative. If it comes to a vote, it will pass since the TWU controls the numbers and will be in strong cost positive territory.