Leto...I am responding to the bolded and large font proclamations made by local 12 about the number of terrorist attacks since 9/11. You all are quick to bash Clinton, (a man I never voted for, BTW), but local 12 is pointing out the terrorist attacks. I merely pointed out that there were a lot fewer prior to the "war on terror".
Why do you consistently post false hoods? do your own research and quit listening to the anti-semetic Liberal Left who will not show you this kind of Information.
Saddam was sort of a "lapsed Muslim"....he was a secular leader - the religious zealots despised him about as much as they despise us.
He was/is a Muslim who never fell into apostasy, and he certainly was a Terrorist.
h34r:
Just a little side note. Before the declaration of war against Japan in 1941 there were no kamikaze attacks. After declaration there was was a bunch. Wars tend to breed nationalism which results in more recruits. I don't think we should be afraid of making our enemy mad, that just comes with declaring war on them.
I'm not worried about making our enemies mad or hurting their feelings. Damn, I wish we wouldn't have cut and run in the hunt for bin laden (remember him...organized the plot to take down the WTC?). Had him cornered and then...lord o'mercy...SADDAM'S the real threat. I wonder what message we would have sent to the terrorists if we stayed focused on bin laden. Personally, I think they would rethink messing with the US. As it is, they'll see that they'll get you to the brink...then find another target and let you go....free to recruit even more terrorists to belly bomb our soldiers.
) and if we did not give them money for their oil, they would still be Bedouins, roaming the deserts and screwing camels.
Looks like the peanut farmer will be passing the "worst president in America's history" baton over to W long about 2009.
Presidential Approval Ratings, Since 1950
