metopower
Veteran
- Nov 28, 2006
- 932
- 313
Absolutely nothingeolesen said:If the IAM isn't afraid to do an investigation, but the company cheerleaders are, what does that tell you?...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Absolutely nothingeolesen said:If the IAM isn't afraid to do an investigation, but the company cheerleaders are, what does that tell you?...
What vote count?WorldTraveler said:so the IAM just threw in the towel because they didn't want to wait for a vote count?
uh huh.
somehow we didn't expect frick and frack to part ways at this point.
You know what they say, where there is smoke, there is fire.eolesen said:If the IAM isn't afraid to do an investigation, but the company cheerleaders are, what does that tell you?...
it says that neither you or they understand what I have said.If the IAM isn't afraid to do an investigation, but the company cheerleaders are, what does that tell you?...
duh.What vote count?
There wasnt a vote and we shall see what happens after the truth comes out, but we already know DL FAs on SAFA and others committed computer fraud using DL Employee #s of pro union DL FAs, and there was a computer trail left.
DL FAs have contacted HR, the IAM and the NMB, the truth and facts will come out.
700UW said:DL FAs on SAFA and others committed computer fraud using DL Employee #s of pro union DL FAs, and there was a computer trail left.
Good. Then we agree. Not sure why you just couldn't say that earlier.WorldTraveler said:no, I have said INVESTIGATIONS are appropriate.
That's a nice comfy nest you've made for yourself. I sincerely would like to have heard that we at least shared a shred of common ground here, but so be it.BABABOOY said:This is where I stand on the subject.
Thanks, man!700UW said:Kevin I stand with you.
**A lot**eolesen said:If the IAM isn't afraid to do an investigation, but the company cheerleaders are, what does that tell you?...
As they should...700UW said:What vote count?
There wasnt a vote and we shall see what happens after the truth comes out, but we already know DL FAs on SAFA and others committed computer fraud using DL Employee #s of pro union DL FAs, and there was a computer trail left.
DL FAs have contacted HR, the IAM and the NMB, the truth and facts will come out.
Whatever.WorldTraveler said:at least you, Kevin, and 698 will go down in flames together.
Enjoy the ride. The afterburner switch is, well, you'll figure it out.
No, this employee (at least tacitly) encouraged others to hack an IAM survey using our coworkers names & PPR's. That's a HUGE f**king deal to me, even if you can't be bothered.BABABOOY said:Do you even know what you are regurgitating from the WC site?
do you even know what SAFA is ?
ONE Delta F/A wrote a STATEMENT on FB to EXPOSE the INEPT, UNSECURED and BOGUS
SURVEY the IAM was putting out.
Was it smart? no, but it is a FAR REACH to blame her for the ENTIRE BOGUS INEPT campaign that
was such a failure for the IAM.
AGAIN look in the mirror.
It tells me Hell has frozen over, because on this very specific point, we agree. The silence is deafening.townpete said:One would think if they are convinced they have been wronged, they would take the offensive position. However they seem to be hunkered in a defensive position.
What does that tell you?
Honestly you should be pounding IAM to initiate the investigation as they are the ones most harmed. They made this nefarious claim so it stands to reason if they have been truly wronged, they need to be the ones to kick it off.Kev3188 said:It tells me Hell has frozen over, because on this very specific point, we agree. The silence is deafening....And yet, not one "anti" on this thread can bring themselves to dare stand with me and call for an investigation of all involved parties....Not one "anti" on this thread has the courage to condemn KLJ's "call to arms."Ya know, it's not like anyone will confuse any of you as being labor supporters.But they would see that regardless of our respective stances on representation we all agree on accountability and transparency.Telling indeed.