700UW said:Why dont you challenge her to one of your infamous "dogfights"?
Why don't you instead attempt to at even feebly answer so much as one of the questions posted above?
Sigh....No matter. You may now return to your nearest "Safe Space".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
700UW said:Why dont you challenge her to one of your infamous "dogfights"?
EastUS1 said:
Why don't you instead attempt to at even feebly answer so much as one of the questions posted above?
Sigh....No matter. You may now return to your nearest "Safe Space".
good luck getting even a reply on thatVeritas777 said:Five Questions for Hillary Clinton
- When are you going to disclose the names of all of the donors to the Clinton Foundation? In your written signed Memorandum of Understanding with the Obama Transition Team, during your confirmation hearings before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, you promised that the Clinton Foundation would be completely transparent. Bill Clinton also went on CNN and promised it to the American people. Yet after it was discovered that secret multimillion dollar donations went to the Clinton Foundation after the questionable uranium deal that your State Department signed off on, Clinton Foundation support Frank Giustra admitted that there are more than 1,000 donors that have never been disclosed. The Clinton Foundation promised in the Spring of 2015 that those names would be forthcoming but we are still waiting.
- Why did your husband’s speaking fees to foreign countries and companies more than triple after you were appointed Secretary of State? We all know that your husband has had successful and lucrative speaking career. But between 2001 and 2012, he gave 13 speeches for which he was paid $500,000 or more. Eleven of those came while you were Secretary of State, most from foreign governments and companies. Can you explain why this happened?
- Why did your State Department approve the transfer of 20 percent of American uranium to the Russian government? Did it have something to do with the fact that the Clinton Foundation hauled in $145 million from investors in the deal, and the fact that Bill received $500,000 from a Kremlin-baked bank for a speech in Moscow?
- Why did the State Department push for open pit coal mining in Bangladesh, in direct violation of Obama Administration policy on advocating for fossil fuels in the developing world? Did it have something to do with the fact that foreign mining magnate Stephen Dattels, who owned a large stake in the mine, gave the Clinton Foundation 2 million shares of stock in the company in a undisclosed contribution?
- Why does your family and the Clinton Foundation continue to accept large sums of money from the business partners, friends, lawyers, and advisors of Marc Rich? Your husband admitted it was a terrible mistake to pardon the international fugitive back in 2001 given that Rich’s ex-wife had made large contributions to the Clinton Foundation before the pardon. Are any the post-pardon payments part of a payoff?
I agree, though I would amend it by saying they don't identify with the Debbie Wasserman Schulz (sp?) type of Democrat.delldude said:Less people identify as democrat now than any other time.
Kev3188 said:I agree, though I would amend it by saying they don't identify with the Debbie Wasserman Schulz (sp?) type of Democrat.
I'm obviously a very left leaning person and live in a very left leaning part of a left leaning city. No one I know is "Ready for Hillary." I also have yet to see any yards signs, but pass tons of Bernie ones every day.
At any rate, I think people still very much identify with values/ideas that have traditionally been tied to the left- that's why you see Sanders having the momentum he does.
It's getting deeper by the day for the Hildabeast. "Need to know Top Secret" on the private server should be a nice long prison sentence for the pant suit cankle queen. Awesomeness.... http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/266326-clinton-emails-contained-need-to-know-classified-infodelldude said:Hey Lefty, wazzup?
Notice HC is now and has to embrace Obama to differentiate herself from the Bern? Many on the left are dissatisfied with the Obama presidency. A few weeks back, HC was mirroring Bernie's platform.
She's in trouble.
Yes she is. And it's not so much that Sanders is gaining ground, it's that she's losing it...delldude said:
Hey Lefty, wazzup?
Notice HC is now and has to embrace Obama to differentiate herself from the Bern? Many on the left are dissatisfied with the Obama presidency. A few weeks back, HC was mirroring Bernie's platform.
She's in trouble.
she certainly hasn't learned from Bill on the skill of being a politicianKev3188 said:Yes she is. And it's not so much that Sanders is gaining ground, it's that she's losing it...
Right? If one wants to be seen as a (wo)man of the people, hosting $2500 a plate dinners isn't the way to go...cltrat said:she certainly hasn't learned from Bill on the skill of being a politician
Damn a 100 more FBI agents? That makes over 250 agents working on the Hildabeast emails? That is unprecedented. I can't wait to see the charges they bring on this criminal that thinks she should be president.delldude said:Just heard FBI probe expanding the corruption with State and Clinton Foundation. 100 agents assigned and another just brought in for temp duty assignments.
Maybe why HC is cloning Obama....?
Either way, it doesn't sound good for her and the rule of law.
xUT said:Well, I don't know how much anyone actually supports Trump.
But IMHO, he's crazy and dangerous.
I would vote for Billery over Trump if they were our only choices.
Not a vote 'for' but a vote 'against'.
The 'Great Shame' is that this is the best America has to offer.
We better offer stock options or performance pay for the POTUS position, something to get the best and the brightest.
WTF?
JMHO,
B) xUT