BoeingBoy
Veteran
- Nov 9, 2003
- 16,512
- 5,865
- Banned
- #76
Rico,
Thanks for clarifying that for me. All is absolutely clear now.
Given your sentiments, you will surely not be offended when the IAM and related, CWA, or AFA don't wish to endure even more long term cuts (remember, these proposals go thru 2010 and 2011) just so you can recoup your relatively short-term pain. After all, each member of those groups is just as entitled as you to consider only what is best for them, even if it hurts you or is "unreasonable" to you.
Jim
ps - since you've given "only" 40%, is it ok for me to insist that the next concessions be imposed on you since I've had a 46% cut in pay, an 87% cut in retirement, 50% cut in vacation value, plus all those work rule changes?
Thanks for clarifying that for me. All is absolutely clear now.
Given your sentiments, you will surely not be offended when the IAM and related, CWA, or AFA don't wish to endure even more long term cuts (remember, these proposals go thru 2010 and 2011) just so you can recoup your relatively short-term pain. After all, each member of those groups is just as entitled as you to consider only what is best for them, even if it hurts you or is "unreasonable" to you.
Jim
ps - since you've given "only" 40%, is it ok for me to insist that the next concessions be imposed on you since I've had a 46% cut in pay, an 87% cut in retirement, 50% cut in vacation value, plus all those work rule changes?