Executives At It Again

[700UW]

Seems the company has filed some statements after their 1113e motion that was not given to the unions as required.

IAM Motion

SR VP Mtc statement

Doug McKeen's Statement

 

[delldude]

i hope judge mitchell sees through this thinly disguised scheme to circumvent the arbitor's decision.

 

[PITbull]

Doug McKeen now works as an EX. VP for ECLAT Consutants.

ECLAT is the very same hired AFA financial analyst for our summer and winter 2002 negotiations.

Benedict Arnolds/traitors every single one of them..they went with the enemy.

Wow, major conflict of interest.

Since AFA's experience with ECLAT, you will now see located in the AFA USAirways MEC policy and procedures that ECLAT is never to be hired for the USAirways flight attendants as a financial consultant.

 

[jack mama]

the arbitor's decision only makes it clearer that its in the contract...so the judge can be clear when he grants the ok to outsource as he approves the 1113 e....

 

[ITRADE]

Roger that.

 

[insp89]

the arbitor's decision only makes it clearer that its in the contract...so the judge can be clear when he grants the ok to outsource as he approves the 1113 e....

[post="188335"][/post]​

Yo mama, You neglected to say [or do you know ?] the judge can grant continued outsourcing only temporily at this point..He can not alter the contract language. ......Since you have your crystal ball out, How about printing the winning lottery numbers for tomorrow ?

 

[seeking the truth]

The company is trying an "end around" the arbiters ruling. In Doug McKeens statement he states the 1113e motion given to the court for mechanic and related relief.

This is an excerpt from it : and a provision permitting the company to outsource any work within the scope of the agreement in order to offset the effects (a) attrition that exceeds historical norms or (b) work slowdowns or other service disruptions .............

In Prestifilippos statement he says the company would need to hire in his estimate 525 furloughed mechincs to accomplish the checks. The IAMs estimate was somewhere around 100-150 mechanics, I believe.

It looks to me that the companies arguements now in addition to the other bogus arguements , as the arbiter agreed with the IAM is the company now doesn't have enough mechanics to do the checks do to attrition beyond the historical norm.

In other words due to mechanics retiring and others leaving for greener pastures the company will now argue there's not enough mechanicss to due the upcoming checks in a timely matter. (attrition that exceeds historical norms)

The company lost on all previous arguements, lack of tooling, facilities, so now they will try headcount. In addition the lack of experience with the airbus . Again another bogus arguement. How many aircraft left Alabama from their S check only to be taken out of revenue service for problems coming out of heavy and repaired by US mechanics ?

Hopefully the judge will grant the IAM the extension they've requested. This will give the IAM time to disclaim the bogus statements being brought before judge Mitchel tomorrow. This management is relentless in the pursuit of ruining this once proud airline

 

[700UW]

7 out of 12 had to be reworked.

 

[700UW]

Judge Mitchell Grants IAM Expedited hearing on Section 1113e postponment

Motion Granting hearing

 

[zonecontroller]

GROUND'EM As they come due!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[seeking the truth]

700uw,

Thanks for the update.

 

[BoeingBoy]

GROUND'EM As they come due!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[post="188865"][/post]​

The company didn't have any problem with that while they fought the IAM over the outsourcing. However, they now claim in their 1113e motions that it would cause "irreparable harm".

Jim

 

[WestCoastGuy]

Just goes to show what extremes the lies have gone. What a bunch in CCY.

 

[usairways_vote_NO]

Motion Denied

Separately, Judge Stephen Mitchell of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied a request from the airline's mechanics union to delay the proceedings, and said it was important to move forward in considering the airline's request for court intervention.