Seems the company has filed some statements after their 1113e motion that was not given to the unions as required.
IAM Motion
SR VP Mtc statement
Doug McKeen's Statement
IAM Motion
SR VP Mtc statement
Doug McKeen's Statement
Executives At It Again
- Thread starter 700UW
- Start date
PITbull
Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2002
- Messages
- 7,784
- Reaction score
- 456
Doug McKeen now works as an EX. VP for ECLAT Consutants.
ECLAT is the very same hired AFA financial analyst for our summer and winter 2002 negotiations.
Benedict Arnolds/traitors every single one of them..they went with the enemy.
Wow, major conflict of interest.
Since AFA's experience with ECLAT, you will now see located in the AFA USAirways MEC policy and procedures that ECLAT is never to be hired for the USAirways flight attendants as a financial consultant.
ECLAT is the very same hired AFA financial analyst for our summer and winter 2002 negotiations.
Benedict Arnolds/traitors every single one of them..they went with the enemy.
Wow, major conflict of interest.
Since AFA's experience with ECLAT, you will now see located in the AFA USAirways MEC policy and procedures that ECLAT is never to be hired for the USAirways flight attendants as a financial consultant.
ITRADE
Veteran
Roger that.
Yo mama, You neglected to say [or do you know ?] the judge can grant continued outsourcing only temporily at this point..He can not alter the contract language. ......Since you have your crystal ball out, How about printing the winning lottery numbers for tomorrow ? 😉jack mama said:
seeking the truth
Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2003
- Messages
- 90
- Reaction score
- 0
The company is trying an "end around" the arbiters ruling. In Doug McKeens statement he states the 1113e motion given to the court for mechanic and related relief.
This is an excerpt from it : and a provision permitting the company to outsource any work within the scope of the agreement in order to offset the effects (a) attrition that exceeds historical norms or (b) work slowdowns or other service disruptions .............
In Prestifilippos statement he says the company would need to hire in his estimate 525 furloughed mechincs to accomplish the checks. The IAMs estimate was somewhere around 100-150 mechanics, I believe.
It looks to me that the companies arguements now in addition to the other bogus arguements , as the arbiter agreed with the IAM is the company now doesn't have enough mechanics to do the checks do to attrition beyond the historical norm.
In other words due to mechanics retiring and others leaving for greener pastures the company will now argue there's not enough mechanicss to due the upcoming checks in a timely matter. (attrition that exceeds historical norms)
The company lost on all previous arguements, lack of tooling, facilities, so now they will try headcount. In addition the lack of experience with the airbus . Again another bogus arguement. How many aircraft left Alabama from their S check only to be taken out of revenue service for problems coming out of heavy and repaired by US mechanics ?
Hopefully the judge will grant the IAM the extension they've requested. This will give the IAM time to disclaim the bogus statements being brought before judge Mitchel tomorrow. This management is relentless in the pursuit of ruining this once proud airline
This is an excerpt from it : and a provision permitting the company to outsource any work within the scope of the agreement in order to offset the effects (a) attrition that exceeds historical norms or (b) work slowdowns or other service disruptions .............
In Prestifilippos statement he says the company would need to hire in his estimate 525 furloughed mechincs to accomplish the checks. The IAMs estimate was somewhere around 100-150 mechanics, I believe.
It looks to me that the companies arguements now in addition to the other bogus arguements , as the arbiter agreed with the IAM is the company now doesn't have enough mechanics to do the checks do to attrition beyond the historical norm.
In other words due to mechanics retiring and others leaving for greener pastures the company will now argue there's not enough mechanicss to due the upcoming checks in a timely matter. (attrition that exceeds historical norms)
The company lost on all previous arguements, lack of tooling, facilities, so now they will try headcount. In addition the lack of experience with the airbus . Again another bogus arguement. How many aircraft left Alabama from their S check only to be taken out of revenue service for problems coming out of heavy and repaired by US mechanics ?
Hopefully the judge will grant the IAM the extension they've requested. This will give the IAM time to disclaim the bogus statements being brought before judge Mitchel tomorrow. This management is relentless in the pursuit of ruining this once proud airline
zonecontroller
Advanced
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2002
- Messages
- 176
- Reaction score
- 0
GROUND'EM As they come due!!!!!!!!!!!!!
seeking the truth
Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2003
- Messages
- 90
- Reaction score
- 0
700uw,
Thanks for the update.
Thanks for the update.
WestCoastGuy
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2004
- Messages
- 813
- Reaction score
- 0
Just goes to show what extremes the lies have gone. What a bunch in CCY.
usairways_vote_NO
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2002
- Messages
- 1,882
- Reaction score
- 57
Motion Denied
Separately, Judge Stephen Mitchell of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied a request from the airline's mechanics union to delay the proceedings, and said it was important to move forward in considering the airline's request for court intervention.
Separately, Judge Stephen Mitchell of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied a request from the airline's mechanics union to delay the proceedings, and said it was important to move forward in considering the airline's request for court intervention.
