enough already
Veteran
- Jan 8, 2003
- 659
- 249
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #31
Just curious. Does anybody know what the original sellout, B-scale creating, early retirement package of 1983 highlights were?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
870 a week agoIs it true last week 800 have already submitted retirement in TULE?
The rest of you 100+ viewers of this thread, feel free to state your opinions.
AA is watching
Hate to be the wet blanket, but can't see AA getting approval to drop what could be ~$180M and up just to avoid involuntary furloughs...
If there are 800 guys lined up & ready to bail out without any incentives, why would the company feel it is necessary to buy people out? just to be nice?.... When was the last time the union offered up something to the company just to be nice? Good goes around, guys...
Between the $75K and 18 months of subsidized health care, you're asking the company to eat some serious money per buy-out, whereas they could just furlough the junior guy for nothing.
Let's assume all 800 of the guys who have said "I'm done" are eligible. And just for gits & shiggles, let's assume that there are twice as many guys who aren't eligible for retirement who want to go.
That's 2400 x 75,000 = $180M just in "incentives" plus what I'd guess is another $4-8M in subsidizing the insurance cost. I have no idea what the sick banks would be worth, but if they're around $5K per employee, that's another $12M that AA doesn't have to pay furloughees...
And you know that those who have subsidized insurance for 18 months are going to run up the tab as quickly as they can type out "elective surgery" on Google.... That's not just conjecture, either. My wife saw it happen when she worked in Benefits....
You want early out benefits? Fight for travel and something else that's going to be non-cash, or maybe stock options worth $X upon exit from bankruptcy.
Same agreement United offered,and we all know AA is in much better shape financially.The middle class has had enoughWhile I wish the company would approve the early out I agree with E. 100% I don't see the company agreeing to it.
I hope am wrong.
It was not offered to the mechanics in BK and there is no indication that it has been offered to any mechanics since the t/a was passed.Same agreement United offered,and we all know AA is in much better shape financially.
I don't have the numbers but if you added up what severence a vested 45 year old member will get, plus protection payment (which will be first thing gone in BK court), the cost to fund your retirement for the next ten years, cost to keep you on the inactive payroll for next ten years, and what ever you will draw in retirement and medical when eligable, etc etc etc, I bet it's not to far off from the amount the TWU has proposed as a buyout. Plus they can replace you imediately with a new hire at what ever poverty rate the BK judge allows them to impose without having to call you back. It's a way for the company to accomplish some of it's own MX at MRO wages by replacing the topped out AMT's with new low paid, unvested, no promises employees.Hate to be the wet blanket, but can't see AA getting approval to drop what could be ~$180M and up just to avoid involuntary furloughs...
If there are 800 guys lined up & ready to bail out without any incentives, why would the company feel it is necessary to buy people out? just to be nice?.... When was the last time the union offered up something to the company just to be nice? Good goes around, guys...
Between the $75K and 18 months of subsidized health care, you're asking the company to eat some serious money per buy-out, whereas they could just furlough the junior guy for nothing.
Let's assume all 800 of the guys who have said "I'm done" are eligible. And just for gits & shiggles, let's assume that there are twice as many guys who aren't eligible for retirement who want to go.
That's 2400 x 75,000 = $180M just in "incentives" plus what I'd guess is another $4-8M in subsidizing the insurance cost. I have no idea what the sick banks would be worth, but if they're around $5K per employee, that's another $12M that AA doesn't have to pay furloughees...
And you know that those who have subsidized insurance for 18 months are going to run up the tab as quickly as they can type out "elective surgery" on Google.... That's not just conjecture, either. My wife saw it happen when she worked in Benefits....
You want early out benefits? Fight for travel and something else that's going to be non-cash, or maybe stock options worth $X upon exit from bankruptcy.
Brother as much as I would like to see it happen, you might as well forget it. The company is going to get rid of the AMTs and its not going to cost them anything! Game, set, match brother. We lose.I don't have the numbers but if you added up what severence a vested 45 year old member will get, plus protection payment (which will be first thing gone in BK court), the cost to fund your retirement for the next ten years, cost to keep you on the inactive payroll for next ten years, and what ever you will draw in retirement and medical when eligable, etc etc etc, I bet it's not to far off from the amount the TWU has proposed as a buyout. Plus they can replace you imediately with a new hire at what ever poverty rate the BK judge allows them to impose without having to call you back. It's a way for the company to accomplish some of it's own MX at MRO wages by replacing the topped out AMT's with new low paid, unvested, no promises employees.
Point taken but I don't believe the company will be successful in getting the severance clause thrown out, protection yes, severence no, so it will cost them at least that.Brother as much as I would like to see it happen, you might as well forget it. The company is going to get rid of the AMTs and its not going to cost them anything! Game, set, match brother. We lose.
Hey E, did you notice the term sheets? They were the lowest of the low and a starting point for some give and takes. Don't you think the same could be said for Little Jimmy's proposal. And by the way, Little Jimmy has been "offering up something to the company just to be nice" for years.
Nope E, good is a one way street...and Little has been good to the company for a long time!
The system is stacked against us, "the working man". The judge will most certainly give the company what they ask for. We are screwed, it as simple as that. Loyalty, dedication and hard work have no place in todays business. Good luck.Point taken but I don't believe the company will be successful in getting the severance clause thrown out, protection yes, severence no, so it will cost them at least that.