Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
thats a good question.i have talked to a few people at local 567 and they get the same treatment. basically this is what we are going to do if you dont like grieve it!bigjets said:Does anybody know if local 514 reps or IAM reps get treated the same way by Wroble or is this just a GP event.
FWAAA said:Seham is a very capable and accomplished lawyer, and I'd trust his judgment on whether the prayer for relief in his complaint is adequate to achieve the desired results.
I am a lawyer and I agree with toroshark. Seham (and I) are completely unqualifed to question the work of a licensed AMT in fixing an aircraft, and my guess is that very few people here are qualified to question Seham's work in this case (I'm certainly not qualified to question it).
Overspeed said:I don't think the Int'l can tell a local which lawyer they can and cannot use if the fees are paid by the local. Seham, while I don't like his work he is just another attorney that is for hire. His long time affiliation with AMFA should not be a reason for not using him. Legally the Int'l could not put the local in receivership.
Does anyone know if aircraft have been grounded by the FAA due to the lawsuit/injunction?
Where is a link to the actual full text complaint?
NYer said:
The FAA is not going to ground aircraft because of a lawsuit.
From the Star-Telegram:Overspeed said:Where is a link to the actual full text complaint?
bigjets said:
I've worked at AA for 20+ years, and I have never been asked to sign or pressured to sign anything off.
I'm willing to bet that if the FAA was concerned with something, the fleet would be grounded.
A little secret for non mechanics, mechanics don't take planes OTS, management does, they ask our input then they decide.
bigjets said:
I've worked at AA for 20+ years, and I have never been asked to sign or pressured to sign anything off.
I'm willing to bet that if the FAA was concerned with something, the fleet would be grounded.
A little secret for non mechanics, mechanics don't take planes OTS, management does, they ask our input then they decide.
What are talking about? You posted the text of the sought after relief:NYer said:The injunction is for the representatives, it doesn't mention the Members.
bigjets said:
I've worked at AA for 20+ years, and I have never been asked to sign or pressured to sign anything off.
I'm willing to bet that if the FAA was concerned with something, the fleet would be grounded.
A little secret for non mechanics, mechanics don't take planes OTS, management does, they ask our input then they decide.
Glenn Quagmire said:What are talking about? You posted the text of the sought after relief:
"C.."Ordering AA, its officers, agents, employees and all persons acting on its behalf to treat with Local 591 and its representatives with respect to complaints of harassment and coercion complaints related to AMT adherence to FAA/IAW maintenance standards."
II. Award punitive damages in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant."
When it refers to "Local 591 and its representatives", that means everybody. You need to get past your bias. It is clearly showing here.
514 is mostly made up of Maint. BASE employees who are not under Mr. Wrobilly's reign..bigjets said:Does anybody know if local 514 reps or IAM reps get treated the same way by Wroble or is this just a GP event.
"Local 591" legally means all the members that belong to that Local.NYer said:So now, the Members can be referred to as "representatives"?
That borders on the ridiculous, but if you need people to believe it then I guess you want to defend it. Copy.