LowManOnThePole
Member
- Jul 8, 2008
- 25
- 8
Odd, my experience since the filing has been the exact opposite. Most agents seem to be doing just fine. They didn't take pay cuts, and won't.
Massive layoffs? Management had already reduced staffing levels via attrition, and its not yet clear how many (if any) agents are going to be impacted by outsourcing airport handling (versus attrition). Even there, agents have always had the same opportunity for a transfer as the TWU does.
Increases in benefits? Agents have already been paying the same rates as management, which is the surviving benefits plan.
The biggest change will be the 401K, for those hired before 1999 who weren't already participating in it voluntarily. Any agent hired since then didn't have a pension option.
All in all, the agents seem to have fared pretty well so far.
Most of the pro-union folks I know of were somewhat bitter high seniority folks just waiting for an excuse to leave.
My guess..... The type of folks the CWA is counting on to carry the representation vote are the ones most likely to say :$%# it and take the buyout.
That's actually not true. The younger, lower seniority agents are just as pro-union as the senior agents. They are worn down, overworked, tired of the ruling by fear and intimidation that seems to be the norm at AA and will continue to be that way. They see the reality of their jobs being outsourced to the company that's run by Del Valle, if they had that much attrition under normal circumstances, new hires would be hired and they'd move up in seniority as it's always been. And it's not. Not anymore. Have you actually talked to any agents?