the merger hasen't even been announced and your thinking about going to lhr. one thing at a time my friendSo UA has a LHR Flight Attendant base i see? Hmmmm. Might have to think abou that!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the merger hasen't even been announced and your thinking about going to lhr. one thing at a time my friendSo UA has a LHR Flight Attendant base i see? Hmmmm. Might have to think abou that!
It has always been a dream of mine to love in London since I was a child. Such a fabulous city. I have been diong the LHR trip all month. Such a great trip.Think long and hard about that one as enticing as it sounds! Even if you are maxed out on the payscale, making ends meet with the weak USD in London can be a challenge. LHR has become a very junior crewbase as all the senior crews began leaving in droves with the devaluation of the US Dollar. Same goes for overseas bases in FRA, CDG and NRT.
It has always been a dream of mine to love in London since I was a child.
3. It is very possible, in my view, that UAL will head back into Ch. 11 and do a rocket docket, like Siegel did with round one, essentially pre-packaging the proceedings. I doubt that they will ask for any rounds of wage and benefit cuts this time.
3. Hubs will be, in order of size, ORD, CLT, PHL, IAD, DEN, SFO
5. A significant number of E-190s will be added to the mainline fleet to give us a cost-effective way to compete in markets where LCC and LUV go head-to-head. This will give us a significant cost advantage.
6. The combined company will apply to reassign some, if not all, of the DCA slot exemptions to SFO and LAX using B757's or A321's on all of the exempted flights.
8. European gateways will be PHL and ORD. South American gateways will be ORD and CLT. Asian gateways will be SFO, LAX, PHL, ORD. All hubs will have direct service to LHR and FRA to allow connections into BMI's and Lufthanza' systems.
OOPS!Those Brits are easy to fall for.
you guys all make me laugh . no one knows what the hell is going to happen.Won't happen. If they do that, it opens the door for a bidding war on the pieces. The international pieces of UAL won't make it thru BK without other people trying to buy them.
Not a chance. SFO and IAD have a significant amount of international O&D that CLT and PHL could dream about.
No, in fact, it will not give a cost advantage. That did not work with E-170s out of PHL, nor PIT, nor anywhere else. Mainline aircraft won't give a cost advantage over LUV.
And the DOT will summarily deny the request.
Write this down: IAD will not be supplanted for PHL. To Europe or Asia.
Ditto for TPA. We work very well with each other for the most part and help out each other whenever the other one has problems.
Let's "unspin" your Spin a bit. The total International O&D (YE 9/2007) for US based carriers at IAD was 2,878,400. The total for PHL was 2,898,018. Since US and UA are essentially the only US based carriers flying internationally from these airports, these numbers closely, if not exactly, represent their actual O&D passenger counts. A further advantage at PHL for US, versus UA at IAD is that 20% of all international flights are on international carriers, whereas that number at IAD is 51% - much more competition. San Juan is not considered International in these numbers. Further, PHL has a almost Twice the Domestic O&D of IAD. I will admit that IAD Possibly has better "quality" (more premium passengers) international O&D than does PHL, but I'd speculate that is principally driven by US's service quality; otherwise, it's unlikely BA/AF would be as successful at PHL as they are...............
Not a chance. SFO and IAD have a significant amount of international O&D that CLT and PHL could dream about.
Write this down: IAD will not be supplanted for PHL. To Europe or Asia.......
"Most of the domestic cuts will come from PHX and LAS"
You got that right! I venture to say that out of the $239 million lost, $125+came from that side
Think long and hard about that one as enticing as it sounds! Even if you are maxed out on the payscale, making ends meet with the weak USD in London can be a challenge. LHR has become a very junior crewbase as all the senior crews began leaving in droves with the devaluation of the US Dollar. Same goes for overseas bases in FRA, CDG and NRT.
So what is the flying like out of the LHR base? Just to ORD,IAD,SFO and LAX? How many trips a day? Eqiupment?Not quite correct. CDG closed during Chapter 11. Most of the Paris base went to FRA. The base is primarily staffed with French and Germans along with a handful of Americans who mostly commute via LH from other parts of Europe. Ditto for NRT. When TPE closed, those F/A's went to NRT and now commute from their homes in Taiwan. The only international base transfers that have been awarded in recent months were to LHR. Not only is the dollar so miserably low against the pound, but the London departure tax is astronomical. As such, the more established Americans have transferred out and LHR transfer awards continue to go very junior. New hires with 2007 seniority are transferring to LHR. On post-Chapter 11 B-Scale rates of pay, most of them aren't likely to last beyond six months...HKG has opened only for a few Vietnamese speakers (UA flies HKG-SGN). NRT and FRA have not put transfers through in years, hence there's been little movement.