probably because the website may have not existed? (would be my first guess) or probably maybe they werent even a member able to post comments? (would be my second)Don't forget that TWA was treated ever so slightly better than Reno was. Reno was "purchased" in Dec. 1998 and all of their current F/A's didn't get seniority dates till Aug. 31st, 1999. How come all the people that complain about TWA being messed over aren't/weren't on here chiming in for Reno back then? Double standard?
I believe its all three, including an apology (if it hasnt already been given)The IAM is the one that owes TWA F/A's an explanation, NOT AA/APFA.
because the language was forfeited based on a promise (the mistake), the judge would have no other alternative.Even after all these years and the dismissals of the lawsuits NO judge has thought these "promises" were valid or not followed.
so now it falls back on the Flight Attendants.. because that may suggest they werent paying attention?Don't forget that AA did to TWA what they did to Reno just 2 years earlier, so they shouldn't have been surprised or caught off guard.
In regards to the "new law" don't think a staple job couldn't happen again. It isn't very likely, but it could happen again under the right circumstances. The law doesn't preclude that from ever happening again, it just makes binding arbitration mandatory if there is no agreement from both sides on seniority integration.
as long as arbitration is now an option..