Blended Seniority List...have you seen it?!?

bored30over

Member
May 20, 2008
29
0
I took a look at the new blended TLOS and lo and behold, there are quite a few MORE "old timers" than new hires (>2005 hire date) than previously believed coming over from NWA. I had mistakenly believed that a majority of NWA mechanics that weren't "replacements" had moved on and honored the picket line . Not so fast my friend! The opposite is true. Like PanAm all over again... :huh:
 
I took a look at the new blended TLOS and lo and behold, there are quite a few MORE "old timers" than new hires (>2005 hire date) than previously believed coming over from NWA. I had mistakenly believed that a majority of NWA mechanics that weren't "replacements" had moved on and honored the picket line . Not so fast my friend! The opposite is true. Like PanAm all over again... :huh:
It will be tough to see who's who. NWA brought the honorable strikers back after the AMFA got back in. Not all are SCABS.
 
I took a look at the new blended TLOS and lo and behold, there are quite a few MORE "old timers" than new hires (>2005 hire date) than previously believed coming over from NWA. I had mistakenly believed that a majority of NWA mechanics that weren't "replacements" had moved on and honored the picket line . Not so fast my friend! The opposite is true. Like PanAm all over again... :huh:

Looking at the list , before blended, it looked like close to 300 were "old-timers" and almost 500 were hired 2005 and later !
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #5
Not even close.
DL NWA was a merger we welcome them with open arms.
DL bought some of the PA assets ,then brought in some ex PA new hires and ended up giving them full seniority.
Huge difference.
Sure, huge differences. However, end result the same. Delta seniority given for no Delta time served. Who gets the short end of the deal? Bottom line...results the same. What kind of seniority did TWAers get when they joined American?
 
Who gets the short end of the deal?
any employee who loses their accrued seniority earned..

What kind of seniority did TWAers get when they joined American?
TWA Flight Attendants lost their bidding seniority...

a law was enacted preventing that from happening to anyone else ever again.

as an aside..

in general, ideas denying seniority (for whatever reasons) only cause unnecessary and avoidable labor issues.
 
Sure, huge differences. However, end result the same. Delta seniority given for no Delta time served. Who gets the short end of the deal? Bottom line...results the same. What kind of seniority did TWAers get when they joined American?
At American, the ex-TWA mechanic and related went to binding arbitration regarding union seniority. Basically, the arbitrator ruled that the twaers get their full TWA seniority at the former TWA bases (MCI and STL) and they get 25% of their TWA seniority at some cities and they get a date of 4/10/01 (the date AA received the assets) at the rest. But in terms of seniority for determining pay, they got their full TWA seniority, which gave them a huge raise in hourly rates of pay; they went from being among the lowest paid in the industry to among the highest paid as a result of the deal.
 
any employee who loses their accrued seniority earned..


TWA Flight Attendants lost their bidding seniority...

a law was enacted preventing that from happening to anyone else ever again.

as an aside..

in general, ideas denying seniority (for whatever reasons) only cause unnecessary and avoidable labor issues.
If the TWA people had received their full TWA union seniority at AA, AA would have faced labor issues of nuclear proportions. AA employees, especially those with a lot of time, would NEVER have accepted a group of very senior people from a FAILED company waltzing in and taking their jobs/positions. We were NOT willing to take their place in the unemployment line. At DL/NW, both airlines bring substantial benefits to the table which result in a combined route system that covers most, if not all, of the world. Also, both DL and NW were about equal in terms of size, strength, financial health, and employee career expectations; the same CAN NOT be said regarding AA's purchase of TWA's assets. In my opinion, DL/NW was a pretty good match and seems to be going quite smoothly.
 
waltzing in and taking their jobs/positions.
you know..

The Flight Attendants..

did not have a choice in the matter, just like the rest of us in these mergers/acquisitions.

a group of "very senior people" coming in.. more than likely (in the near future) as opposed to longer term.. would have probably retired sooner than some may think...especially nearly 10 years after the fact..maybe not all but most, by now...

(know what Im sayin')
 
which gave them a huge raise in hourly rates of pay; they went from being among the lowest paid in the industry to among the highest paid as a result of the deal.
let me explain something here..

in general, there is no amount of money someone can throw at someone and expect that to fix or justify losing seniority..

and a huge raise means nothing.. if someone only has it for a few months and then furloughed out the door.
 
you know..

The Flight Attendants..

did not have a choice in the matter, just like the rest of us in these mergers/acquisitions.

a group of "very senior people" coming in.. more than likely (in the near future) as opposed to longer term.. would have probably retired sooner than some may think...especially nearly 10 years after the fact..maybe not all but most, by now...

(know what Im sayin')
It is a well known fact that many people with high seniority don't retire even though they are able to do so. Why? Because in the case of F/As they fly the longest routes 2 or 3 times a month and are done; and they get top pay to boot, they fly a few days a month and thats it, it's virtual retirement at top pay. Additionally, at least at AA, some just give away their trips and fly very little, if at all. If the TWA F/As and all the other TWA employees would have been able to bring their 30 and 40 years of bidding seniority to AA, they would have never retired because at AA's much higher pay rates and pension accrual, they would have attempted to make up for all those many years of poor earnings and lack of pension accrual at TWA. There are still many ex-TWA people at AA, in fact, some on the ramp pick up CSs (extra hours from people who want time off) and overtime; they practically live there. Why? To make up for the poor wages and lack of pension at TWA; they have even said as much.
 
let me explain something here..

in general, there is no amount of money someone can throw at someone and expect that to fix or justify losing seniority..

and a huge raise means nothing.. if someone only has it for a few months and then furloughed out the door.
Thats right. There was NO amount of money that AA could have thrown at it's long time employees to "compensate" them for being stapled (thus losing seniority) under the TWAers. And that hypothetical huge raise would have meant nothing if long time AA employees were forced to take the TWAers place on the street.

There are still many ex-TWA at AA. As for the ones furloughed in 2003, well they got an additional two years.
 
Thats right. There was NO amount of money that AA could have thrown at it's long time employees to "compensate" them for being stapled (thus losing seniority) under the TWAers. And that hypothetical huge raise would have meant nothing if long time AA employees were forced to take the TWAers place on the street.

There are still many ex-TWA at AA. As for the ones furloughed in 2003, well they got an additional two years.
AA guys got stapled?

Instead of blaming your co-workers from TWA (or ANY merged airline on the seniority they bring with them), blame the executives who make the decision to merge.
 
Back
Top