The classic answer to the egregious award is found in the old merger adage: "if both sides are pissed, then it was a successful arbitration."
Unless expectations were out of whack.
AWA Meger Committee
- told their pilots not to have expectations about the arbitration results
- published the transcripts every day after the hearings
- successfully forcasted a "ratioed" integration model, and based their proposal on it
AAA Merger Committee
- promised their pilots date-of-hire
- didn't wavier from their date-of-hire position even after being advised by their attorney and the arbitrator to the contrary
- did NOT publish the transcripts; instead published a daily slanted editorial about the hearings
- spent union money to produce "date of hire" stickers for flight bags
No surprise about the disparate reactions.
BTW - If AAA is willing to pay (up front) to hold another arbitration, I'm confident that the result would be the same or more in the AWA pilot's favor. However, in order for me to agree to that, AAA would have to agree to:
1) Reimburse the AWA MEC for all merger expenses to date.
2) Pay - up front - the anticipated expenses for another arbitration
3) Ratify a joint agreement in advance of the next award so this second award stands
Anybody out East who is confident that a new arbitration would yeild them better results should have no problem signing on to this proposal.