How would it do that? LCC is not a party to the lawsuit.Interesting read.
How fast can you say Chapter Seven?
One good thing is this litigation if it survives Discovery & pre-trial motions should discourage any merger activity and REALLY put the Tempe Boys in some very tight knickers as they now will actually have to manage the airline and work with their employees and labor groups which to date they have been loathe to do.
Good God, man, where are you getting your legal advice from? What statute of limitations are you referring to that is anywhere near expiring?A couple of points to consider:
An important note is that the EC was scheduled to rule today on teh Nicolau Award and neither MEC had any clue on how the EC would proceed.
Therefore, the US Airways MEC concluded it had to preserve its right to take court action. If the MEC had not filed a timely suit the case could have been thrown out without a hearing on the merit, but simply on the basis of a lack of timeliness.
So which is it . . . the filing of the complaint was driven by the EC "ruling" on the award (whatever that means), or the filing of the complaint had nothing to do with the EC's actions? You have totally contradicted yourself in one post.It is my understanding, the action in the D.C. Superior Court is independent of the actions taken by the EC today.
Regards,
USA320Pilot
At this stage, what kind of brief are you referring to? (I.e., in support of or in opposition to what, and at what procedural step?)For the record, that looks like the complaint, not the brief. Can't wait to see the brief.
It will be a looooong time before the litigation will be at a stage where the court will entertain a brief on the merits.