Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you giving credit to the IAM for those 33 stations? AMR's stations are protected under scope. Other than 10 stations that are class 1 at US AIRWAYS, you can thank AH for keeping the other 23 open, as much as it pains me to say that. Even ORD can be contracted out.That would be 33, not 24 and its more than AA and UA.
Well, this thread has officially become useless for any sort of meaningful exchange of information.
Between the personal attacks and the IAM's biggest and loudest defender, every single goddamn topic turns into the same goddamn thing.
I may as well stick to airliners.net...this is ridiculous.
I'm starting to agree. 700. Chime in all you want but it's starting to get irritating on things that can be googled . You wanna help the membership then just leave the answers alone. Every post is some sort of EGO ARGUEMENT. Please add pertinent info if you can. Not every question deserves a rebuttal for christs sake
+1
I find it interesting how the CWA is doing every current job of each job function, at each station, under scope. And 700 is attacking the CWA. And I differ with Prez as well regarding why the CWA has done better.
Canale gave up profit sharing for nothing. Wasn't even in bankruptcy. Gave up Mainline express, and scope for nothing at all. Dumb Dumb Dumb.
Management went after ramp because the IAM just rolled right over the past 15 years. Why wouldn't it? It still will until the leadership finally says, "NO"!!!!!!!!!!!! Maybe that time has arrived. Time will tell if our union leadership signs a fence agreement or an otherwise less than fair ta with full recommendation.
regards,
I don't particularly think you work for them or give a damn if you do for that matter.You guys crack me up, go look on the International's District 142 or LL 1725's LM-2, I am not on there, I am not getting paid by the IAM and I dont work for them.
I wasnt not the communicator when we were Distrcit 141M, that is the District we were in during bankruptcy #1 nor on the negotiating committee, get your facts straight.
I was involved with 142 after that, and NC during bankruptcy 2, which was in 2004 and 2005, not during bankruptcy #1 which was 2002 and 2003.
Dont let the facts get in your way.
You all make this way too easy, thanks.