Phoenix
Veteran
- Apr 16, 2003
- 8,584
- 7,430
Very well stated. It appears we have a recalcitrant side (no surprise) that wants unilateral control over a SLI that's already been arbitrated. It's not surprising PIB, EofA, 320Driver et al are so averse to having a neutral third party determine fairness. These guys just don't get it.
The judge didn't tell both sides to get another arbitrator to pick "either or" (may as well just wait for MB arbs) she warned both sides to come to a settlement or else. She is obviously out of line is she not? She was supposed to give you an injunction for the Nic! Or she was obviously supposed to mind her own bidness and let the MOU play itself out, right? Well she did neither, but she still could do either, or worse.
USAPA supporters have already expressed movement from DOH numerous times. I got a feeling Furgy has received a personal phone call from Doug already warning him not to drive drunk!