A sad ending for such a bitter group
What a compelling argument.....here is your 330.
breeze
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A sad ending for such a bitter group
700uw is an ill ask management loyalist who was pushing a ta that contracted his own job out and even though he sat on the negotiations team he didnt know how to read the language, so he is simply incapable of understanding the legality of sympathy strikes as he listens to everything the ill ask management pipes in his rented out brain. The kicker is that he doesnt even work in the airline industry. I dont wish anyone an extended layoff of five years but at some point, 700uw has to stop living off of public assistance and quit vegetating on the internet. regards,
"Three impartial arbitrators' decision is powerful evidence of a fair arbitration"
Judge Silver
14 May 2013
Are the arbitrators suppose to ignore the law of M/B? Read the law before you start making unsupportable statements. Paragraph A1 and C. What year was the US Airways merger? What year did M/B become effective? usapa does represent ALL US Airways pilots correct? At the time of our merger both pilot groups were represented by ALPA, the same union and we used that merger policy.I don't have any dreams tonight. Only more questions.
Can one of the West Class explain to me what exactly they expect to happen in mid-May? As best I can figure, Judge Silver is supposed to disregard all the law in the East filings, and declare ripeness. And by doing that somehow the NIC would immediately become the law of the land and our seniority list. Is that it? By declaration from the bench the East pilots will be told they were tricked and actually voted on a proposal that 1) was not in keeping with their CBL, and 2) was never presented to the Company by USAPA as a bargaining position (other than for the brief period as ordered by Judge Wake.)
And will Judge Silver now disregard her previous ruling that USAPA was free to pursue something other than the NIC?
And how will a ruling of ripeness play out for merger concerns? A ripe ruling will send the parties scrambling back to higher courts on appeal, and the M/B process favored by Parker and the UCC will be interrupted. The ONLY way this merger proceeds uninterrupted is for Silver to do a res judica, and dismiss. Is she really going to declare our process ripe based on a premise there will be a POR, and thus a material MOU? My questions keep coming, and no matter where I go the only way things move smoothly is for the process of the MOU to go forward, having been ratified by 98% of the West Class.
Don't give me your bravado. Give me some logic and law that says Silver will impose the NIC on the East pilots. I want to hear some arguments that are based on more than simply using East pilot's pictures as avatars on your profiles.
Greeter
......
M/B does not apply ....
10. A seniority integration process consistent with McCaskill-Bond shall begin as soon as possible after the Effective Date... US Airways agrees that neither this Memorandum nor the JCBA shall provide a basis for changing the seniority lists currently in effect at US Airways other than through the process set forth in this Paragraph 10.
98% of West pilots voted to use MB.... Are you one of the 24 that voted "no"?
M/B does not apply and can not be used to integrate east and west pilots.