Granny got the bad guys to run without an AR15 and with only 2 shots.
Had she done so with an AR15, as was not uncommonly the case when Korean-American shop owners protected themselves and their property during the LA Riots....Would that have been a "bad thing"? If so...WHY? Should the shopowners have been made 'criminals" for their actions? Would 7 rounds have worked for them?
I mean, I know, I know..."Of course" this sort of thing could NEVER, EVER happen here in the good old US of A!!!, well, at least ever again...or...well...umm...but...well..err...anyway:
"On the second day of the riots, the police had abandoned much of Koreatown. Jay Rhee, a storeowner in the area,
stated to
The Los Angeles Times, “we have lost faith in the police.”
With the cops nowhere to be found,................
According to the
Los Angeles Times, “From the rooftops of their supermarkets, a group of Koreans armed with shotguns and automatic weapons peered onto the smoky streets . . . Koreans have turned their pastel-colored mini-malls into fortresses against looters tide.”
Rhee claimed that the storeowners shot off 500 rounds into the sky and ground in order to break up the masses of people. The only weapons able to clear that much ammo in a very short time are assault weapons. Single shot pistols or rifles might not have been able to deter the crowd hell-bent on destroying the neighborhood."
http://www.amren.com...aved-koreatown/
No matter, I suppose. I'll leave it at this for now: Why don't any of you marvelous folks that so desperately wish to make your fellow citizens helpless and defenseless just march right up to that "Granny", flash an obama sticker or two, and demand that she hand you her weapon(s)? Let us all know how that works out for you.
🙂
