WeAAsles
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2007
- 23,465
- 5,258
AMFA Organizing Drive to Replace Association
- Thread starter TWU informer
- Start date
- Status
scorpion 2
Veteran
- May 11, 2012
- 539
- 562
If the fleet group does a card drive will the deicers and turd truck drivers go back on the fleet list? We all know the answer to that. Of course they would. It’s nice to have a slush fund of heads the NMB allows to be moved for the right price. I’d love to see a forensic financial audit of the 3 people that make up that so called government agency.
WeAAsles
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2007
- 23,465
- 5,258
So says the guy looking desperately to change his Union for the last 30 years. It must really suck being a loser for so long.
Desperate at 125k? Nope dont think so. But I can afford 8 St is...
Last edited:
WeAAsles
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2007
- 23,465
- 5,258
You seem obsessed with me. Well I guess since your other obsession is now completely dead and buried under 12 feet of dirt, it would be expected that you’d need to find a new obsession.
BTW congratulations on your 125k. My Brother who’s a High School dropout made 250k last year with his business as a Rigger. To think he never even needed to go to a little Trade School like yourself to make that kind of money. Golly gee whiz.
WeAAsles
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2007
- 23,465
- 5,258
BTW are Yachts more your style? Don’t want to give you any details about this picture or you might get a little more obsessed with me than you already are. It’s 60 FT though.
WeAAsles
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2007
- 23,465
- 5,258
Perceived failure? I’m sorry but I think I read all the rulings from the NMB and once again that old faithful never ending drive sputtered and died. You can of course keep “trying” to piss on my Corn Flakes but the wind is blowing back at you and not in my direction.
Anyway bro you honestly weren’t the target of my assholeness and I’ll admit I am being a full blown A Hole. My target is those backstabbing pricks Painter, Ostrich, Stewart, and the swamp rat. You and I had some good civil PM’s in the past so I really never had any beef with you even if you are pissed off at me right now.
But hey if you want to keep razzing me by calling out Dave or Davie and knocking one of my cars have at it. I haven’t had any good back and forths since I left this site. I kind of missed the punches.
WeAAsles
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2007
- 23,465
- 5,258
In a victory for the IAM and transportation union members across the country, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear two cases that sought to bring anti-union, so-called “right-to-work” laws to the airlines and railroads.
The cases sought to extend the landmark Janus ruling, which allowed public sector workers to receive the benefits of union representation without paying union dues, to airline and railroad workers who are under the Railway Labor Act.
The IAM, the largest transportation labor union in North America, vigorously fought both cases.
The Supreme Court dismissal is another defeat for conservative, anti-worker groups like the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, which represented the workers seeking to gut union representation in the airline and railroad industries.
“This is a huge victory for IAM Transportation Department members,” said Richard Johnsen, Chief of Staff to the International President. “This dismissal means that, once again, the enemies of working people will not get in our way. We look forward to continuing to grow our power for airline and railroad workers from coast to coast.”
The IAM’s strength in the airline and railroad industries has been evidenced by continued industry-leading contracts and unprecedented relief for working families during the pandemic.
“The IAM is the most powerful voice in the world for airline and railroad workers,” said IAM International President Robert Martinez Jr. “The IAM Transportation Department and the IAM Legal Department are to be commended for fighting and winning against these anti-union forces.”
www.goiam.org
The cases sought to extend the landmark Janus ruling, which allowed public sector workers to receive the benefits of union representation without paying union dues, to airline and railroad workers who are under the Railway Labor Act.
The IAM, the largest transportation labor union in North America, vigorously fought both cases.
The Supreme Court dismissal is another defeat for conservative, anti-worker groups like the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, which represented the workers seeking to gut union representation in the airline and railroad industries.
“This is a huge victory for IAM Transportation Department members,” said Richard Johnsen, Chief of Staff to the International President. “This dismissal means that, once again, the enemies of working people will not get in our way. We look forward to continuing to grow our power for airline and railroad workers from coast to coast.”
The IAM’s strength in the airline and railroad industries has been evidenced by continued industry-leading contracts and unprecedented relief for working families during the pandemic.
“The IAM is the most powerful voice in the world for airline and railroad workers,” said IAM International President Robert Martinez Jr. “The IAM Transportation Department and the IAM Legal Department are to be commended for fighting and winning against these anti-union forces.”
Supreme Court Won’t Hear Cases Seeking to Gut Airline, Railroad Union Power - IAMAW
In a victory for the IAM and transportation union members across the country, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear two cases that sought to bring anti-union, so-called “right-to-work” laws to the airlines and railroads. The cases sought to extend the landmark Janus ruling, which...
www.goiam.org
4A Mechanic
Member
- Jul 17, 2012
- 91
- 62
Just curious...tell me which side of the fence do you swing from? TWU or IAM or both? It's seems to me you swing both ways! I would use a LMAO but JimmyBop used them all up. He's another I got mine brother and screw the rest. Just my view of the typical TWU/ IAM way of thinking!In a victory for the IAM and transportation union members across the country, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear two cases that sought to bring anti-union, so-called “right-to-work” laws to the airlines and railroads.
The cases sought to extend the landmark Janus ruling, which allowed public sector workers to receive the benefits of union representation without paying union dues, to airline and railroad workers who are under the Railway Labor Act.
The IAM, the largest transportation labor union in North America, vigorously fought both cases.
The Supreme Court dismissal is another defeat for conservative, anti-worker groups like the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, which represented the workers seeking to gut union representation in the airline and railroad industries.
“This is a huge victory for IAM Transportation Department members,” said Richard Johnsen, Chief of Staff to the International President. “This dismissal means that, once again, the enemies of working people will not get in our way. We look forward to continuing to grow our power for airline and railroad workers from coast to coast.”
The IAM’s strength in the airline and railroad industries has been evidenced by continued industry-leading contracts and unprecedented relief for working families during the pandemic.
“The IAM is the most powerful voice in the world for airline and railroad workers,” said IAM International President Robert Martinez Jr. “The IAM Transportation Department and the IAM Legal Department are to be commended for fighting and winning against these anti-union forces.”
Supreme Court Won’t Hear Cases Seeking to Gut Airline, Railroad Union Power - IAMAW
In a victory for the IAM and transportation union members across the country, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear two cases that sought to bring anti-union, so-called “right-to-work” laws to the airlines and railroads. The cases sought to extend the landmark Janus ruling, which...
WeAAsles
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2007
- 23,465
- 5,258
Actually as an FYI the two cases were both brought against the IAM. One was by a United Airlines Fleet Service Agent out of Texas and I think the other was a PSA. So the IAM was the one who had to pay for the Lawyers to defend the case.
I’m sure if the case had been brought against AMFA it never would have even got to the SCOTUS cause they would have blown it and lost much earlier in the lower court.
United Airlines employee asks U.S. Supreme Court to hear forced union dues case
(The Center Square) – Austin, Texas-based United Airlines fleet service employee Arthur Baisley has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his federal class action lawsuit against the International Association
WeAAsles
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2007
- 23,465
- 5,258
4A Mechanic
Member
- Jul 17, 2012
- 91
- 62
Sorry, but it's not worthy of wiping my ass with!Do you like the shirt a buddy of mine got for me at the Convention?
View attachment 16124View attachment 16125
4A Mechanic
Member
- Jul 17, 2012
- 91
- 62
Pure speculation on your part about how AMFA would have handled it.Actually as an FYI the two cases were both brought against the IAM. One was by a United Airlines Fleet Service Agent out of Texas and I think the other was a PSA. So the IAM was the one who had to pay for the Lawyers to defend the case.
I’m sure if the case had been brought against AMFA it never would have even got to the SCOTUS cause they would have blown it and lost much earlier in the lower court.
United Airlines employee asks U.S. Supreme Court to hear forced union dues case
(The Center Square) – Austin, Texas-based United Airlines fleet service employee Arthur Baisley has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his federal class action lawsuit against the International Associationwww.google.com
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
