Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was before the IAM organized UA PCE.700UW said:And DEN built a whole brand new airport for expansion, not a good example, lol!
A seaplane base just doesn't work anymore.WorldTraveler said:Land is NOT the issue. The sìze of the market will determine success of any hub.
DEN has lots of land, three airlines still fighting it out, and likely an unprofitable hub for any.
DL doesn't hub at DFW because DL had less than 15% of the local market despite 250 flights. DL's local share now is not muchblower even though DL has 1/5 the flights
DTW killed CVG. DTW still has one of the highest ratios of 50 seaters of any DL hub but DTW also supports many more int'l and large markets.
there have been proposals to build a new separate south terminal at ATL but the costs are too high and DL doesn't want gates at that cost. Same will apply to CLT. At some point the benefit of more gates is not worth the cost
I can't really understand the overall ? too well, but if your rumor relates to a CLT-LAX and/or a CLT-SFO non-stop flight, it's a bit unreasonable. DL, which flies non-stop seasonally PHL-CDG, already tried PHL-LAX and failed. Why then would they risk CLT-West coast after their experience with PHL - which isn't a fortress hub? Now if DL had some inside info that CLT was planned for downsizing, then I could see them do a pre-emptive test to early capture some FFs. As far as new DL east coast destinations from CLT, other than to their existing hubs, which they already fly to, that's even more unreasonable. It'd be interesting if you could provide the cities rumored.LD3 said:Help me out with yield and other revenue factors.. CLT is a fortress hub and handles approx 90% of the traffic, but there are 34 other cites with higher fares than CLT. I know it wouldn't bode well with John Q Public, but why are the airfares lower than the 34 cities ahead of them? Is it something that AA/US is doing wrong that they are not generating hight yields? It's not like UA,WN and JB are going like gang busters here, DL is a different story, rumor on the ramp yesterday is that DL is looking to add 2 long distance westbound flights along with some direct east coast destinations, gate space is holding it up...
robbedagain said:B767 CLT-BRU weekly nonstop in addition to weekly nonstop flights from CLT to MAN, LIS
Brussels Airlines (SN) is part of Star Alliance.robbedagain said:I thought that Brussels Airline was part of Skyteam or One World but not sure. Youre right itd be better to be funneled thru LHR and MAD
WorldTraveler said:DFW is not a terribly "pretty" airport either.
WorldTraveler said:DEN has lots of land, three airlines still fighting it out, and likely an unprofitable hub for any.
On a trashy USAIR A330-300700UW said:They wont move MAN from CLT to MIA, no need for it.
And LH has committed to the CLT-MUC flight, as they have contracts with BMW and others for that flight.
Also US has run CLT-FRA for years, way before US was part of Star.
knock yourself out.737823 said:On a trashy USAIR A330-300
From MIA I can get the LH A380 with better onboard service than the senior CLT mamas deliver.
Josh