robbedagain
Veteran
- Oct 13, 2003
- 11,125
- 2,676
Rat I agree with you bro. JCW i agree with you too bro. Its like a pax travelin say CHS to LHR wont go to MIA out of the way when CLT is nearby
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No AA shouldn't be catering to that market, you can't be all things to all people. Richmond to Nashville? That's the markets and demographics USAIR served well before the merger. Let DL fly them. I understand the economics just fine, get off your high horse and stop with the attacks.jcw said:That's right it makes perfect sense to fly from RIC to MIA to get to BNA
Your logic is so flawed it's sad
Let's see CLT is 600+ flights per day and MIA is 300+ so there is no comparison
I realize ecomincs is over your head based upon CLT being the most profitable hub in the combined network
get off your high horse and stop with the attacks.
Josh
737823 said:No AA shouldn't be catering to that market, you can't be all things to all people.
nycbusdriver said:
Too bad for you (and lucky for us) that Parker totally disagrees with that thought. The whole POINT of combining the two airlines was to attempt to "be all things to all people." That's why neither the AA network nor the US network was effective.
While he admits that AA may never actually reach the goal of being "all things to all people," that does not mean that the carrier won't give its best effort to go there and exceed its competition.