V.O. Reason
Veteran
- May 3, 2019
- 659
- 88
I think the court case is going to dictate the whole process and whatever agreement comes out
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stock price? That's the new barometer?
You realize Labor costs, as any expense, brings down stock price, right? You want a spike in the stock price, let them cut Maintenance to the levels other airlines have cut it. You're not in favor of that, I'd imagine.
Ill bet you bitched about every AA CEO in your career.And dont give me Crandall and his B scale
If some of you have not seen the latest memo/email put out by the individual who is representing the IAM membership first and foremost,
let me just post one line that should be extremely telling/troubling about this farce.
""The regular negotiating teams are not present for these talks."
In other words, those presidents who were elected and chosen to represent us (TWU) in negotiations are not even allowed to be there to do their jobs. In my opinion, this should be totally unacceptable.
I think the court case is going to dictate the whole process and whatever agreement comes out
Not gonna argue with you two, if you think this group of “officers” is doing a good job that’s fine with me.
That's been happening since the Executive Committee started going in. This had been negotiated by the International, but the Negotiating Committee or any of the Local Presidents.
The argument isn't that they're doing a good job or not, the argument is that stock price isn't a barometer Labor should use to make a point.
Paa's margins are woeful compared to ua and especially dl. basically abandoning premium strategies to chase the once a year bargain-hunter traveler has failed, especially due to the fact the american economy boomed, with billions of dollars begging to be made from businesses and the wealthy. they want to be pampered and they don't care what the cost of an inflated first class ticket is.
when delta is raking in more revenue than aa, off of less flights, that says it all.
this is what aa used to be.
when analysts are getting grilled by their largest clients about aal...this is a legit argument.
aa's margins are woeful compared to ua and especially dl. basically abandoning premium strategies to chase the once a year bargain-hunter traveler has failed, especially due to the fact the american economy boomed, with billions of dollars begging to be made from businesses and the wealthy. they want to be pampered and they don't care what the cost of an inflated first class ticket is.
when delta is raking in more revenue than aa, off of less flights, that says it all.
this is what aa used to be.
when analysts are getting grilled by their largest clients about aal...this is a legit argument.
maybe this shows how much the upper echelon thinks of it's local presidents.
when incumbents start losing every election..they have to feel some pressure from local presidents. in the past year or so, the local presidents of dfw/mia/ord all lost??
what does that tell you? the rank & file are angry. at first - i believe the anger was misdirected, but now with it appearing the iam runs the show and subsequent TA disappointments, these guys will get angry at everything twu.
perception becomes or is actually, reality.
P
The last 4 or 5 CEOs likely faced similar criticism at some point .I just dont remember this world class airline you speak of.I used go do stats before the merger and i could tell you right before the merger AA was last in all metrics and that wasn't including Eagle who reported separately to DOT and their numbers were awful.Nope all i remember over tbe years was a struggling airline as were all the airlines except LUV
P
The last 4 or 5 CEOs likely faced similar criticism at some point .I just dont remember this world class airline you speak of.I used go do stats before the merger and i could tell you right before the merger AA was last in all metrics and that wasn't including Eagle who reported separately to DOT and their numbers were awful.Nope all i remember over tbe years was a struggling airline as were all the airlines except LUV
really?
did you ever wonder why us air went bk twice, co in 90s, ua, nw and dl...while aa didn't file until 2011? that never seemed odd to you?
sure, aa work groups made concessions in 2003. but, my pension accrued for another 8+ years and that's why the 'new' aa will pay me a pension, because of the strength of aa from mid 80's to 2011.
you don't want to admit to the strength of aa from mid 1980s-2011.
your aa history timeline starts in 2011? no, you need to go back a bit further and you'll figure it out...why the merged airlines wanted the 'aa' name and why me and others will get paid a pension.