NYer, I really don't understand your point. A. It's not a moan, it's a fact...stating someone is moaning because you disagree with their perspective is well, reminiscent of the past (if you know what I mean). B. Blame the people if you will, and that's perfectly fine. It's the people who form the Association and the Association was a failure. I realize you are an Association supporter and you will defend it (the concept) no matter what. This was doomed to fail from day one in many of our opinions (from day one) and we didn't care or even know who the folks were that was going to be the voice and/or negotiators of the Association, especially from the IAM side. Our prediction, an overwhelming correct call. Of course now after the fact you can state people bad, concept good...so do we change out people and continue down this road to see if indeed you are correct? That, in my opinion is the only way to prove if you are correct. Otherwise, I was.
Finally NYer, you state that the Association is further along than we would have been if the TWU were the controlling party...how you can say that when we are now damn near the end of the process (and I use end loosely as it still may be a while) is beyond me. Obviously that is speculation on your part because you have nothing to back that comment up. I on the other hand do have a comment about the Association that has played out as predicted, and it's not a moan, it's a fact...just sayin!