Airbus Arbitration Scheduled

[N628AU]

Here are the statisitics:

http://data.bls.gov/servlet/SurveyOutputSe...ods=Annual+Data

Some higlights: 2003 Average Unemployment rate of 6.0%

1994: 6.1%
1993: 6.9%
1992: 7.5%
1991: 6.8%

All years were above 6.0% from 1975 to 1987, expect for 1979, when the rate was 5.8%.

You can try and spin the numbers anyway you want, but historically, they are not bad.

 

[savyinvestor]

Well said PITbull!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Savy

 

[USA320Pilot]

700UW:

I'm not going to debate you on this issue. The IAM is looking down a double barrel shot gun and if its loses the upcoming arbitration, will likely see its head blown off.

The company wins most grievances, even when the unions believe they have a slam dunk case, so the uncertainty of what could occur certainly exists.

Moreover, there is reason to believe the company does not want to negotiate with the IAM and the union could be irrelevant.

Respectfully,

USA320Pilot

 

[savyinvestor]

If, If, If, If, If, If,................................................................ Savy

 

[colorado_cowboy]

The unemployment statistics are gathered by those who collect uenmployment benefits

Exactly!
Individuals who are no longer eligible for unemployment benefits are not figured into that percentage. Add those who are out of work and are no longer eligible for unemployment benefits and you'll see that things are worst than you are being led to believe.

 

[700UW]

700UW:

I'm not going to debate you on this issue. The IAM is looking down a double barrel shot gun and if its loses the upcoming arbitration, will likely see its head blown off.

The company wins most grievances, even when the unions believe they have a slam dunk case, so the uncertainty of what could occur certainly exists.

Moreover, there is reason to believe the company does not want to negotiate with the IAM and the union could be irrelevant.

Respectfully,

USA320Pilot

Funny if the company does not want to negotiate then why did they ask the IAM to come to the table again last week? (Sr VP of Maintenance John Prestifillipo).

And why are you not gonna provide your facts?

Guess you are not because you don't have any and your posts are just more untruthful statements to try to scare and intimidate IAM members, you have shown what you really are, someone who is not honest and cannot back your own position with facts and/or figures.

And I suggest you worry about your own house, because you will soon be working for John Orenstien, and maybe you will make enough not to qualify for food stamps.

And I suggest when you make statements the IAM will lose as it always has, you provide relevant and factual information and data, otherwise don't post because you are credibility is gone with any IAM members as you have been proven to be a fraud with your statements.

 

[colorado_cowboy]

Moreover, there is reason to believe the company does not want to negotiate with the IAM

If the company doesnt want to negotiate with the IAM and ALPA will only agree to concessions if all other Unions participate what then?
Will the management approach the IAM or will the concessions that ALPA and UAir have agreed to be dropped?

 

[USA320Pilot]

700UW:

700UW said: "Funny if the company does not want to negotiate then why did they ask the IAM to come to the table again last week? (Sr VP of Maintenance John Prestifillipo). And why are you not gonna provide your facts?"

USA320Pilots: For the same reason the company asked ACAA to renegotiate the Pittsburgh hub payments. P.R. There is a back up plan currently being worked on that will be very, very painful for the IAM if things go south.

Regards,

USA320Pilot

 

[ktflyhome]

USA320Pilot: Would you please be specific on the "back up plan that is being worked on that will be very, very painful. I always see you eluding to "inside information". Why don't you just come out with it!!!!!!!! You always seem to have all of the "Inside Scoop". Talking to Dave all the time. Are you legally bound to keep you mouth shut.?? <_< If so, why post at all. <_<

 

[700UW]

KT, is nothing more then a scared man who would sacrifice anyone else except himself, he does not provide facts to back up his statements which basically are deception to try and scare and intimidate people.

The intelligent people on this board seem him for what he is, which is someone who continually posts false information, and when he is called out on it and asked to provide facts, he ignores it because he knows he is wrong and was found out.

 

[700UW]

Moreover, there is reason to believe the company does not want to negotiate with the IAM and the union could be irrelevant.
Respectfully,
USA320Pilot

700UW said: "Funny if the company does not want to negotiate then why did they ask the IAM to come to the table again last week? (Sr VP of Maintenance John Prestifillipo). And why are you not gonna provide your facts?"

USA320Pilots: For the same reason the company asked ACAA to renegotiate the Pittsburgh hub payments. P.R. There is a back up plan currently being worked on that will be very, very painful for the IAM if things go south.

Regards,

USA320Pilot

So which one is it?

You can't have it both ways, for over a week you say the company does not want to negotiate with the IAM and now you say they will.

Your crediblity as suken to negative levels.

Just come out and admit that you were wrong and you have been posting wrong information to try and scare IAM members.

Since your blantant lack of facts shows the posters on the board that very fact!

Ah return of the "painful" clause that myself and numerous other posters have asked you to provide facts and proof of for over a month, and you have not, we all can see thru another one of your untruths!

 

[High Iron]

A320, You're too much for Hollywood.

Let's see, I can hear the salient point now: "Make an ( yet another ) argreement with us...or else we'll violate even more of the agreements you've already made with us!"

Riiigghhht Really makes you want to hurry up make a deal again, doesn't it

 

[700UW]

This one is for you a320pilot

 

[ClueByFour]

Moreover, there is reason to believe the company does not want to negotiate with the IAM and the union could be irrelevant.

What exactly are these reasons? Where can one read about them?

 

[700UW]

Clue, you can't!

Another one of his fabrication of the facts