galley princess
Senior
- Nov 4, 2007
- 384
- 263
Every time I get discouraged about how bad it is here, and I wonder what kind of a loser I must have been for choosing this airline to begin with, I remember that this whole thing is a great big aberration. It happened on 9/11, a horrible day, it has wrought so much pain for so many people.
One of the more offensive results of 9/11 was how some very greedy amoral executives parlayed it into the biggest gutting of labor contracts in history. Remember, before 9/11, Jerry Glass lost. The contract we had was not a "parity + one" contract. Did we take concessions we shouldn't have? Sure, that happened, but what happened with the bankruptcy contracts was unprecedented. The manipulation of the bankruptcy process was unprecedented. There were a lot of factors at work and one was that there was a real and present danger of US turning the lights out. So we lost. Big.
What no one foresaw, or at least that can be my hope, that they really didn't foresee how this new breed of management would exploit and milk these contracts for all they are worth. It is my belief that Mr. Parker et. al have no intention of negotiating. They have the lowest paid workforce in the industry. Why would they give it up? The old management was actually concerned about the UsAirways name, that gave labor leverage. Unhappy employees=unhappy customers. To this management of accountants the name is irrelevant. It's clear. We are the voted worst airline in the world. How far in the toilet can you go? But they aren't bothered. Throw in that so far they aren't exactly wrong, the flying public clicks on cheap ticket, not name, and they're formidable.
We are having to reinvent the wheel on this one. This kind of management requires a new approach. Even the fuel burn doesn't move them. At some point we're going to have to find a way to really inflict some pain, but the only kind they respond to is financial. For the flight attendants I do see some good trends. This is not the group that got dragged under the bull dozer of bankruptcy. There are more flight attendants in school, with small businesses, other jobs etc. They will strike when the time comes because they have less to fear. That is assuming that US continues to exist. This is the kind of group that would think nothing of breaking US into pieces and selling it for the highest profit while they cash out.
As I said once before, time to get one's house in order. And as we get closer to 2011, the end date of the F/A contract, think hard about settling for anything. The only game this management plays is hardball. It might behoove us to wait to 2011 and get to a strike. The major victim in this is of course AWA. They were already far along in their negotiations. They were dealt a raw deal on this one, and typical of this management, they were maneuvered out of their only real power, the right to strike. Remember this when whatever tentative they cough up is produced. Whatever they offer, it won't be enough.
I am repeating this here because I think it might be applicable to this discussion. The thing is, a work stoppage is illegal except after a certain amount of time during contract renewal. Even though MF recently says he foresees a new contract in 6-10 months, I think that he is being overly optimistic. As time goes on, we really need to think about leverage and positions of strength.
I asked once before if AWA was precluded from leaving joint negotiations and returning to Section 6 of their own. The one response I got said that they didn't think it was possible. Why? I see where AFA East wouldn't want it, it throws our chance of doing away with this abysmal contract we have, but I submit that all that is happening here is that AWA is being rooked out of their position of strength, and at this point, we as flight attendants should be more interested in pursuing strength. IMHO, it is a foregone conclusion that we will be saddled with this mess until we get close to 2011 when suddenly they'll be interested in bargaining. That's our mess, but it wasn't AWA's. If they could break off and negotiate for themselves, we all win.
The thing is, this seems very grey to me. What are their rights? The company is not negotiating in good faith, I think that's obvious. Is there any outrage on the part of AWA flight attendants? I would be livid.
This relates to the reserves in that AWA does not have the baggage that we do. They would be more likely to cough up something more palatable to the reserves and bring a new variable if and when a joint agreement would finally be hammered out. This is all theoretical, but my point is, while Travelpro's angry solution isn't possible, we do need ideas.
CHAOS was born out of the minds of Alaska airlines flight attendants and it changed everything for us. There has been no answer to CHAOS in its pure form yet. It's time to get creative and come up with answers. (Sorry for such a long post)