You left out the ME Too that we gave away as well, and can you tell us how this would affect the Equity Stake?
The me-too from Horton expired of its own terms once all labor groups agreed on new contracts. Anyone looking for a me-too provision in the MOUs should ask Parker for one.
We gave up $2.2 billion for 4.8% of the Equity of the new AA, now US is going to get equity, doesnt that water down the value of our Equity stake? Will we still be entitled to that 4.8% equity stake in the whole company?
Fortunately, no. The equity claims of the three workgroups are measured against the value of the new AMR, excluding the value of any entities merged into AMR. Example: If AMR emerged on its own, and was valued at $8 billion, then your 4.8% would be worth $384 million. If AMR and US are merged when AMR exits Ch 11, and the combined entity is worth, say, $10 billion, two billion dollars of that belongs to the current LCC stockholders and the AMR creditors won't get a portion of that, so your claim would still be 4,8% of the $8 billion, not 4.8% of the $10 billion.
If that's not satisfactory, then imagine if Apple and AMR merged when AMR exits. You would not be entitled to 4.8% of the combined $500 billion entity. Most of that would still belong to the current Apple stockholders, not the AMR creditors.
$2.2 billion is roughly $110,000 per member. Lets say the new company is worth $10 billion, our stake would only be worth $480,000, or $24 per member, so in exchange of $110,000 per member in concessions we get $24.
You need a new calculator. 4.8% of $10 billion is $480 million, or $24,000 per member (if there are 20k members).
Profit Sharing vs the raise, granted I'll take the bird in the hand but why give up the ME Too? If you are justifying giving up Profit Sharing because you feel the new company will not be profitable then why would you agree to concessions? If they are not profitable you do know what that means dont you? Another BK and a demand for more concessions. We are already dead last, by a wide margin, how much further are you willing to go?
Agree about giving up all profit sharing. If the company isn't profitable, another Ch 11 awaits. In a couple of weeks, DL will hand out $372 million in profit sharing, which WT said would be more than 6% of 2012 W-2 wages, on average.
AA did claim in court that they would be making nearly $3 billion a year in profits after the restructuring, wildly optimistsic, but they were using that projection to justify the cuts, claiming that we would get back nearly everything we were giving up due to profit sharing. If the new company still wont be profitable then wouldnt it have made more sense to maximize pay and benefits until they inevitanly fail instead of throwing more good money after bad?
No, AA did not claim it would make $3 billion in profits (for profit-sharing purposes). AA did claim that its target EBITDAR was $3 billion. There is a huge difference between an EBITDAR of $3 billion and $3 billion of pre-tax net profits on which profit-sharing is based. Delta just reported net profit of $1.6 billion and its profit-sharing is based (as AA's is) on pre-tax profits before profit-sharing and before the periodic performance bonuses (similar to the AIM awards) and before special items (those non-cash writeoffs that set you off). With DL's 15% profit-sharing formula, that results in $372 million in profit-sharing for 2012 which will be paid in two weeks. Third year in a row with big profit-sharing at DL. 2010-12 profit-sharing totals $949 million in addtion to the periodic performance bonuses.
And don't the DL mechanics make more than you? Plus they get more than 6% of their W-2 wages in profit-sharing checks?
If you're going to keep working for a bankrupt company and give concessions, it's beyond stupid to give away the 15% profit-sharing that Horton offered in the Term Sheets. Good negotiators would have raised that in the final agreements to something higher, perhaps 20%. But your union's leaders include a guy who lies about college degrees (doesn't Little have a fake diploma mill degree?) so I can see where the stupidity is.
You guys need to replace the TWU before the ink dries on the merger so that AMFA could negotiate real profit-sharing with Parker, like 20% of first-dollar profits.