Why Tim Nelson is Dangerous to IAM-represented employees at United Airlines
- Thread starter Socplat13
- Start date
-
- Tags
- iam tim nelson united
- Status
robbedagain
Veteran
- Oct 13, 2003
- 11,125
- 2,676
Ratified by 65%
WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
- Banned
- #739
UA just received what it needs to gut its workforce over the next few years. A couple hundred million is a small price to be able to restructure their way out of a merger that has become way too expensive and isn't delivering what was expected.
good luck.
Good fight, Tim
good luck.
Good fight, Tim
The scourge of every working class person has been soundly defeated by the masses, again. Now lets see how he fares in the big leagues. Have a great trip down to dol. Your actions will not be forgotten and you will not be forgiven. As the lady said on fb "peace out, douche bag".
cltrat
Veteran
- Aug 29, 2007
- 5,481
- 3,051
lol if anyone knows douchebag it's you Davejet job said:
I guess you'll settle in next to Delaneys rear end now unless you feel a need to go out and scam some per diem off the membership.
No doubt we will see you as Bluto or probably some new name on the US/AA forums at some point.
Kev3188
Veteran
Enjoying the insulation of being in a District job created just for him.
Tim Nelson
Veteran
Well, at US AIRWAYS, our work is cut out. I'm sure AH will want to bring the non-union work rule contract from United over to US AIRWAYS. The most critical thing that we know is that Parker made the decision to dump all new 70+ seat RJ's with PSA as opposed to Piedmont or American Eagle. Therefore, we have to keep our station classification language which includes any company jet over 69 seats to be tabulated for scope. That's what I personally would red circle over most everything else since it directly relates to the current scope. Secondly, we have to preserve the part time % and solid health care [when compared to AMR and UA].
The good thing is that we already have all 3 of these things in our contract and shouldn't have to give any of it up. With the company making record profits, the gains that I would like to see are scope. I know some may want more time off and that is worthy but without scope, we have nothing.
The good thing is that we already have all 3 of these things in our contract and shouldn't have to give any of it up. With the company making record profits, the gains that I would like to see are scope. I know some may want more time off and that is worthy but without scope, we have nothing.
Kev3188
Veteran
737823 said:
What gave it away?
Kev3188
Veteran
cltrat said:
+1
Exactly...
Another failing of the IAM. What's to say the same won't happen at DL? They make all these promises in the drive like they did for sCO and now look at what they have.Kev3188 said:
When will the bids start going out? PVD will likely be outsourced ASAP, many senior folks there.
I'm sure Upper Marlboro is pleased, nothing like bringing on new dues payers. But the simple fact is any gain from sCO is marginal as the IAMs roles and dues revenue has fallen considerably over the past decade.
Josh
- Status
