Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
USA320USA320Pilot said:Light Years:
What you fail to understand is that I am not communicating with the frequent malcontent posters, but sending a real message to the silent majority. It’s called a third party message.
Most reasonable people understand the reality of the marketplace and basic economics, whereas those who have so much pent up anger refuse to recognize the changing marketplace and the need to adjust.
That’s the true definitions of insanity, just like in the steel industry.
It’s easy for you to come onto this website while you are furloughed because you do not have a hand to play, but it’s different for many other employees. The sentiment of this board, which is much like a cease pool, is not the sentiment of the rank-and-file members.
It does not matter what you or I think. The only thing that matters is that the marketplace is driving change and there are thousands of people who would work at US Airways for an America West type contract. That’s why the LCCs and RJ operators are growing like the weeds.
Do I like it? Nope, but I will not bury my head in the sand and vent on a message board instead of facing reality.
Regards,
USA320Pilot
Actually, the judge doesn't force anything. Sec 1113 requires further good faith negotiations between the employer and the represented employees, and the court must find that the employees rejected the company's offer for no good reason [emphasis mine], before the court can allow rejection of the contracts.funguy2 said:Tim:
I disagree. My understanding of S.1113 of the BK law, which deals with labor agreements, is that the company can ask the judge (or vice versa I suppose) to force new negotiations. The judge cannot void the contract (a change made post-Lorenzo). If the company pushes forward with such a request, and their negotiating position is concessions or else, the unions may have to go to 'self-help' just to maintain the current contracts.
My gut tells me (and some posters on these forums) that some unions feel they have given enough, and that there is no more left to give. So I think you could indeed see a strike if management forces the labor issue in BK Ch. 11. I think this would happen prior to any exit financing strategy being developed, as I think management would have to present cost reductions to lenders/investors in order to obtain exit financing.
That's just my hunch, and based on my understanding of S.1113. If I am wrong, please correct me on S.1113.
I'm assuming you mean cesspool (unless I'm misunderstanding... I've never heard of a ceasepool). If I thought a place were a cesspool, I'd no longer frequent it, much less be its most frequent user.USA320Pilot said:It’s easy for you to come onto this website while you are furloughed because you do not have a hand to play, but it’s different for many other employees. The sentiment of this board, which is much like a cease pool, is not the sentiment of the rank-and-file members.
It does not matter what you or I think.
Fine. However, there are other opinions and indeed, sometimes you have your facts something less that accurate. Therefore, the rest of us have the right to point out those inconsistencies and other points of view to the third party, silent majority. Thus, the third party, silent majority can take all the facts and opinions and make their own determination as to their own feelings and opinions, rather than take one guy's word for it.USA320Pilot said:What you fail to understand is that I am not communicating with the frequent malcontent posters, but sending a real message to the silent majority. It’s called a third party message.
You've admonished someone for failing to understand, perhaps you should look in the mirror when next you make that statement.USA320Pilot said:What you fail to understand is that I am not communicating with the frequent malcontent posters, but sending a real message to the silent majority. It’s called a third party message.
It does not matter what....<snip>....I think.