OP
PropPiedmont
Senior
- Dec 10, 2003
- 273
- 0
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #16
J4J is not flow down and you know it.
As a matter of fact yes I could. That's what I was doing when I got hired at ML.
Are you doing it now?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
J4J is not flow down and you know it.
As a matter of fact yes I could. That's what I was doing when I got hired at ML.
Are you doing it now?
That's funny coming from an IAM guy.Rico,
You lost any objectivity when you insulted and called them names, no need for that type of behavior.
That's funny coming form an IAM guy. I guess I should take lessons on inter-union behavior from your peaceful and cooperative working relationship with fellow co-workers...?
Sure thing.
That's nice.I have gotten along with every union on the property.
I do not have any respect for a lot of the ALPA so called leadership, especially in 1992.
Ask Pitbull, her and I developed a friendship due to our union involement.
The PSA MEC is now working with PDT on the flow negotiations. Their original stance was if the flow disappears then all the J4J pilots would get booted off property.
Must suck to be so angry.
And US asked mainline ALPA to put RJs on the mainline fleet years ago, and they rejected, and as late as Gangwal asked too only to be rebuffed.
Just like Air Canada, they put their RJs on the mainline fleet.
And US asked mainline ALPA to put RJs on the mainline fleet years ago, and they rejected, and as late as Gangwal asked too only to be rebuffed. Just like Air Canada, they put their RJs on the mainline fleet.