Using the Olympics to push the Gay Agenda.

Ms Tree said:
I think I'm going to regret this but I'm bored so what the heck.

What behavioral freedoms threaten the republic and are not protected?
 
Behavior freedoms that are no threat vs Constitutional freedoms (political speech, bearing arms) that threaten the power of the state and are trampled on is the point of the video.
 
The 2nd is not a behavioral freedom. Neither is the 1st. What else do you have? How are these freedoms not protected?
 
Nobody said they are.
 
You're kind of dense sometimes.
 
Are you suggusting that the government doesn't suppress freedoms protected by the First and Second Amendments?
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #66
Black Magic, on 10 Feb 2014 - 7:08 PM, said:
Black Magic said:
Exactly..who cares about anything.  Let the people snort, inject, smoke, anything and everything they choose and watch the nation go down the toilet.
 
 
Ms Tree said:
Yes. It's called freedom. Do you have something against that? Are you under some sort of delusion that you know what's best for us heathens? You are aware that there are others out there who think they know the truth as well. Hint. It's different than your truth. Prove it wrong. In dare you.
I love how libtards complain about the government and then want to hand them even more control over their lives. 
 
Typical libtard stupidity. Support the government controlling everything then chastise other people for "hating freedom". Libtard Logic 101.
 
If you think the United States is "progressing" you are the foolish one. One only has to look at the libtard capital of the United States California to see where that road is headed.
 
traderjake said:
Nobody said they are.
 
You're kind of dense sometimes.
 
Are you suggusting that the government doesn't suppress freedoms protected by the First and Second Amendments?
I am suggesting that supression differes from regulation.
 
Ms Tree said:
Yes. It's called freedom. Do you have something against that? Are you under some sort of delusion that you know what's best for us heathens? You are aware that there are others out there who think they know the truth as well. Hint. It's different than your truth. Prove it wrong. In dare you.
I'll tell ya what.  Let people use any substance they want but when they rot their lives away they get ZERO money from the government when they can no longer support themselves. More burdensome on society this nation doesn't need. It would be nothing more than nature taking its course and cleaning up the gene pool.  But alas that will never happen as the libtards are the queen of spending other peoples money on the worthless.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #70
Black Magic said:
I'll tell ya what.  Let people use any substance they want but when they rot their lives away they get ZERO money from the government when they can no longer support themselves. More burdensome on society this nation doesn't need. It would be nothing more than nature taking its course and cleaning up the gene pool.  But alas that will never happen as the libtards are the queen of spending other peoples money on the worthless.
It is a libtards (failing) economy. You just live in it........ and support it (through taxes). Your opinion does not count though..... apparently. Even though you (and China) are the one funding the country.
 
Your job is to work, pay for everybody else, and keep your mouth shut about the stupidity that goes on around you.
 
Yes Black Magic my friend the welfare crowd is the new royalty.
 
Black Magic said:
I'll tell ya what.  Let people use any substance they want but when they rot their lives away they get ZERO money from the government when they can no longer support themselves. More burdensome on society this nation doesn't need. It would be nothing more than nature taking its course and cleaning up the gene pool.  But alas that will never happen as the libtards are the queen of spending other peoples money on the worthless.
Nice idea but 1. How do you prove they ingested an illegal substanceand 2. What substances will be illegal? Any food in too much quantity can cause health problems. Is fast food legal or illegal in your world? Tobacco? Wine? Processed food? Beef? Sweets? The list goes on.

The thing about laws that you seem to have a very difficult time grasping is that you cannot just make up laws that suit your POV. The law must be specific. If you want to deny service because of something they ingested you have to prove fault. Kind of hard to do. Some tbings are easier tonprove (meth or hard drugs) but they are a small portions. Tobacco kills roughly half a milion peolle a year. Im all for denhing them public services but good luck with that.

That is all beside the point. The issue is freedom. You and the state have absolutely no right or justification to tell me what I can or cannot do with my own body. So long as there is no dirrect affect on you, you need to mind your own business.

If two people of the same gender love each other and want to share their lives together itnis none of your business. It does not affect you. It does not involve you. You have no say.
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
 Yes Black Magic my friend the welfare crowd is the new royalty.
Oh yeah, it is so very glamorous and attractive to be "welfare royalty".

It is frightening to see your thoughts put out for all to see.
 
Ms Tree said:
That is all beside the point. The issue is freedom. You and the state have absolutely no right or justification to tell me what I can or cannot do with my own body. So long as there is no dirrect affect on you, you need to mind your own business.
 
 
 
that's cool but when what you choose to do affects you either health wise or economically or both then don't expect me or my tax dollars to bail you out.
 
Ms Tree said:
Nice idea but 1. How do you prove they ingested an illegal substanceand 2. What substances will be illegal? Any food in too much quantity can cause health problems. Is fast food legal or illegal in your world? Tobacco? Wine? Processed food? Beef? Sweets? The list goes on.

The thing about laws that you seem to have a very difficult time grasping is that you cannot just make up laws that suit your POV. The law must be specific. If you want to deny service because of something they ingested you have to prove fault. Kind of hard to do. Some tbings are easier tonprove (meth or hard drugs) but they are a small portions. Tobacco kills roughly half a milion peolle a year. Im all for denhing them public services but good luck with that.

That is all beside the point. The issue is freedom. You and the state have absolutely no right or justification to tell me what I can or cannot do with my own body. So long as there is no dirrect affect on you, you need to mind your own business.

If two people of the same gender love each other and want to share their lives together itnis none of your business. It does not affect you. It does not involve you. You have no say.
 
You really want to compare eating a candy bar to doing heroin?!  It really is true liberalism is mental disorder!!
 
cltrat said:
that's cool but when what you choose to do affects you either health wise or economically or both then don't expect me or my tax dollars to bail you out.
Every actikn has some affect on something. Are sayjng that we sbould let people starve or die becauee of their actions? What about the family and how they are affected.? I think its easy ti saythat people need to be held respinsibke for their actikns and Iin princible I agree with you. The problem is in the fine print. If someone smokes and get cancer do we let them die? What if they are the sole or primary provider in their family? Do the kids and spouse have to suffer as well? Some may say yes, I dont think it is that clear cut.

And again. None of this has anything to do with same sex marriage.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top