More on point than you realize.I don't see it either. Let's look at the hubs:
AA
JFK
MIA
ORD
DFW
LAX
US
PHL
CLT
PHX
So a merged AA/US would have JFK, PHL, CLT and MIA on the east coast. Two of those would have to go on the chopping block, and I can guarantee you it wouldn't be JFK or MIA.
DFW and LAX for AA basically service the same markets that PHX does for US.
So there's your answer: just shut down US, it's not necessary.
US has the highest casm in the industry. It also has the weakest performing network. What the LCC'ers are suggesting is is to dismantle theirs, use the capacity to build upon AA, and not add to the total capacity in the industry.
My question is: if AA needs to build its network, why add the highest cost, most senior, weakest performing network(s) to accomplish this? MIA is running at less than 70% of capacity. Why not build on MIA organically? Post BK AA's cost structure, new fuel efficient fleet, entry level lower cost employees will help blow LCC out of the water to the Caribbean and SA from both PHL and CLT. This amounts to natural displacement of traffic (revenue) to our network from theirs, doing it the old fashioned way -competitively. We're not meant to be partners in the industry. We're competitors (bigbusboy)
JFK needs to grow. PERIOD. LCC is of absolutely no help here. B6 absolutely is, i.e. turn key feed, newer efficient aircraft, network dynamics that complment AA and OneWorld, and a more desirable employee base. LCC's departure from the NYC market only weakens their position in terms of corporate contracts. You also have to consider just HOW important NYC in terms of international biz travel. For example, looking at Lufthansa's summer schedule, they're flying an A330 from MUC daily, along with two flights from FRA to JFK. One a 747-400, the other an A380.. All with no Star partner in JFK. AND EWR just across the river!! (They're bringing an A380 to MIA as well and we don't even serve the city pair) AGAIN, LCC is of no help in JFK!!!!
When one considers PHL's future, and to a lesser degree CLT, you have to assume in a merger scenario that LCC would depart the Star Alliance and join OneWorld. The international traffic lost would only further weaken PHL and CLT allowing their costs to creep up and lose the mass that currently makes them viable as hubs. PHX and LAS always seem to take the back burner and hardly anyone disagrees that one or both would be closed... AND the fact that LCC is more interested in AA's hubs anyway.... Are they the asset everyone claims they are or ain't they???????
Lets take a little trip down memory lane.........................
Here's DP's first unsolicited amorous advance on DAL.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/701345/000095012306014162/y27297k2exv99w1.htm
What should be noted:
1. The combined airline will shrink by 10%
2. 8 billion dollars. 4 billion borrowed, and 4 billion of LCC stock.. which was based on a share price of ~$51. Todays price is $6.26
3. bases labor rates at the higher of the two carriers.
Moving onto the "revised" offer:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/701345/000095012307000262/y28825exv99w2.htm
Of note:
1. The total borrowed/financed $ is now at 8+ $billion
2. AA's value today even in BK is well north of the 9-12B$ DAL was valued at in 2006.
So, what does it all mean? IF DP is going to make a drive by offer while AA is in BK, and, assuming he is successful, what would the combined company debt picture look like? Better yet, how big would the offer have to be? 13 Billion? 15 billion?
And all of this to abandon LCC's operation and attach it to the AA operation?
more later..... its happy hour!!!!