All the points made by your MEC were moot points. They say the AWA MEC and their lawyer had nothing much to say...well they are right East have no case so West has nothing to argue. West wants the award to stand and it will.
Here's the recap from the West MC:
AWA MERGER COMMITTEE UPDATE
May 22, 2007
At 1300 yesterday, the ALPA Executive Council convened at the Herndon office in open session to hear a presentation as requested by the AAA MEC concerning the seniority integration Award. As we are certain you know, the AAA MEC asked the Executive Council to set aside the Award because, in their view, it was not “fair and equitable†and did not comply with ALPA Merger Policy. Before the open meeting commenced, the Executive Council met in closed session with its attorneys for a briefing on ALPA’s legal responsibilities with regard to that Award.
Participants at the open session, in addition to the Executive Council and Captain John Prater, included the AWA MEC Officers, Merger Committee, and Communications Chairman, and the AAA ALPA MEC Officers, Merger Committee, and Communications Chairman, together with their respective Merger Counsel, Jeff Freund for the West, and Dan Katz for the East. In addition to the direct participants, there were around 40 Pilots from both the West and East in the meeting room and approximately 400 Pilots from the East who viewed the proceedings on closed-circuit, non-recorded telecast in conference rooms in ALPA’s offices.
Under the ground rules for the presentation, each MEC had a total of 30 minutes to present their positions followed by a 10 minute rebuttal period for each side. A question and answer period by the Executive Council members followed the presentations and National President Captain John Prater closed the session with a few brief remarks.
The AAA Merger Committee presented their views first. Their presentation summarized a 20 page pamphlet that they distributed to the Executive Council that afternoon. As soon as we have a copy of the presentation in electronic format, we will post it on the web site. Their assertions were that, for reasons identical to the arguments they made at the arbitration (and that the arbitration panel rejected), the Award did not adhere to the 5 Merger Policy tenets found in ALPA section 45. As a broad overview of their position, they asserted that the Award produced a major windfall for the West Pilots at the expense of the East Pilots.
We elected to have our attorney, Jeff Freund, express our views on this matter. Although allowed a 30 minute period, Jeff encapsulated our entire position in a highly articulate 15 minute presentation. Jeff summarized the 18 page brief we had submitted to the Executive Council members last Friday (a copy of which will be posted on the web site).
Our presentation in that document and to the Executive Council was simple: the merits of this case have been considered exhaustively in 18 days of arbitration hearings that produced over 3,000 pages of transcript testimony through 20 witnesses and 14 volumes of exhibits. The arbitration panel was chaired by an experienced seniority integration arbitrator freely selected by both Merger Committees and included two pilot neutrals, each selected in accordance with Merger Policy. There were no procedural irregularities in the process and both sides were able to present all of the evidence each desired to present. Following the close of the hearing, the arbitration panel met for an additional 6 days of discussions and analysis, and rendered their Award on May 1, 2007. On the face of the Award, it is clear that the panel understood the facts, understood Merger Policy and applied that policy to the evidence presented. Jeff made clear that we had not come to the Executive Council to rehear the case or present additional testimony. Rather, under Merger Policy, the Executive Council can and should do only two things at this juncture; namely, present the Award to management and defend the Award against any effort by anyone to reject it. He reminded the Executive Council that there is no procedure under Merger Policy for ALPA to do anything else, that there is no precedent for it doing anything else and that, in fact, when other pilot groups have tried to undermine seniority integration awards or agreements in the past, ALPA has vigorously and successfully resisted those efforts.