Actually I think Cosomo should challenge WT to a duel on the grounds of bemsmirching (sorry JB Guppy, I am too lazy to use 10 words when this one fits nicely ) his good name. Ualdriver could second him and, well, not quite sure who could second WT! With phrases such "getting desperate" I have noticed a not-so-subtle shift from speaking to the points to speaking to the person - always a grave error in disputation and debate unless it is meant in a witty manner such as Sir Winston's telling a female dinner guest that no, he did not contest the 'fact' that he was drunk, but that the 'fact' also stood that she was ugly and that in the morning he would be sober.
Sorry WT. I obviously cannot marshall the financial data with the skill of Cosmo to make a purely analytical judgement, but if I were to judge this round on the presentation of the data, I have have to hand the point to him as he has deftly lured you from speaking to the points.
For those keeping tally at home. I would humbly submit:
Round 1: Cosmo 1, WT 0
Cheers
UK,
no offense taken, besmirching fits just fine. WT is so desperate to make DAL's continued buffoonery look good he is making up pure falsehoods and outright BS at this point. He never follows up with actual numbers....
JBG