UA-CO Merger Rumors Now Surfacing on Wall Street

Jungle,
I'm not doubting that UA's employees will not get a pension. But that is not the issue. The issue is that not having pension liabilities has always been an almost universal requirement for a merger in the airline industry. While known, pension liabilities are liabilities nonetheless and investors would rather see NO liability and allow management to develop plans to compensate people than have to inherit liabilities and figure out what to do with them.

Cosmo,
You’re really getting desperate.

To argue that UA is not competitive but someone, somewhere will find money to invest in this fabled merger which cannot be backed up by evidence demonstrating that UA and CO can together run a winning airline is hallucinogenic at best. Sure, someone has money but to expect them to part with it and invest it in two sinking stars is fanciful at best.

Yes, DL’s consolidated CASM went up but its RASM went up over twice as fast because DL has shifted some domestic flying to Delta Connection carriers.

You and I know that the best comparison of airline operations is mainline to mainline among the six network carriers. On that basis, and on others as well, UA is simply not generating the revenue premiums necessary to overcome UA’s costs which are the industry’s highest. UA employees should be absolutely livid that they gave up so much – way more than other carriers’ employees – and yet UA still cannot get its costs under control.

UA can talk until the cows come home that they know they have a cost problem but they lost their opportunity to get it right. Instead of getting their operational costs down in bankruptcy, they beat their employees, lessors, and municipalities to a pulp, eliminating any possibility of good will to help in the future. The reason UA can’t get its costs down is because they have a no-growth business model in a seniority based system where labor costs are only going to rise. UA’s costs cannot go down outside of another bankruptcy.

I know what is happening at UA is your worst nightmare but it’s also exactly what I predicted would happen. UA has languished in financial purgatory for a decade now except for a couple years of grand performance at the end of the 90s – at a time when anyone that could find Jet-A could make money. When times got bad, UA fell first among the biggest carriers and it fell hardest. Other analysts are saying exactly what I’ve been saying: UA’s fundamentals are abysmal right now but UA can get by because there is enough decent paying business to be had. We all know that there will be downturn because there always will be whether it comes from a new competitor like Virgin America or from a military or economic or health crisis but it will come. And UA will be first to fall again.

The next bankruptcy will not be as nice to UA. Investors will demand new management and will be forced to entertain selling the company in order to recover some of the value they still have in the company. UA is still run by some of the same clowns that presided over it during its failed ESOP era and its bankruptcy so it’s obvious they can’t figure out how to turn the company around. Don’t get mad at me – get mad at the board of directors and tell them to throw those rascals out. If you care about United Airlines, it’s time to act. – and it may even be too late already since we never know what the future holds – which for the airline industry is as likely to be disastrous as not.

There’s no excuse why UA should continue to be performing as badly as it is.
 
The issue is that not having pension liabilities has always been an almost universal requirement for a merger in the airline industry.

I didn't know there were ANY universal requirements for a merger between two airlines, including pension liability.

Cosmo's getting desparate? That's funny!

Sure, someone has money but to expect them to part with it and invest it in two sinking stars is fanciful at best.
Continental is a sinking star too? I disagree with your thought that UAL merging with Continental (or anyone else for that matter) would have difficulty finding a money source. I'm not saying that it's going to happen because no one knows. But I bet one ORD-LGA flight with a limo to lower Manhattan would yield some very willing participants if Tilton and "the other guy" were willing to make the trip.


You and I know that the best comparison of airline operations is mainline to mainline among the six network carriers. On that basis, and on others as well, UA is simply not generating the revenue premiums necessary to overcome UA’s costs which are the industry’s highest.

Put away the shotgun World. This is the kind of stuff that makes you incredibly unbelievable. You talk in these "platitudes" but you RARELY provided REAL numbers to back up what you say. OK WT, I'll bite (again) Certainly someone who claims to have, "A depth of intelligence that goes well beyond the press releases" would realize that statements such as the above take an incredible amount of time to analyze and compare, especially when comparing complex, multi-billion dollar companies such as airlines.

So World, this is what I would LOVE to see from you. Since you have a great depth of intelligence (your words), someone as intelliegent as you would never come onto a message board and just post dribble without the thorough understanding of the numbers behind such statements. So I'm sure you've spend hours and hours studying all of the major airlines, analyzing their costs, their revenues, cash flow, etc., and based your above statements on numbers that you arrived at in your conclusions. You must have those numbers, right WT?

So to back up your claim (which may be right or wrong, I honestly don't know because I haven't looked at enough of the numbers), I'm sure all of us on this forum would like to see each network airlines' consolidated ASM, mainline CASM, and non-fuel mainline CASM. Then please show how you adjusted these costs for stage length. Then I'd like to see the same revenue numbers for each airline, again stage length adjusted as I'm sure you understand that those types of adjustments are necessary for an "apples to apples" comparison. Give us at least several quarters' worth. I'm sure you looked at least that far back before coming to such a conclusion. Don't forget to include your source (i.e. SEC filing, company press release, BTS data, etc.)


UA can talk until the cows come home that they know they have a cost problem but they lost their opportunity to get it right.

So if an airline is not in bankruptcy, they can't take steps to get their costs down? Really?

Instead of getting their operational costs down in bankruptcy, they beat their employees, lessors, and municipalities to a pulp, eliminating any possibility of good will to help in the future.

So if a bankrupt company screws their employees, lessors, and municipalities gently in a bankruptcy process, there's MORE good will for the future?

The reason UA can’t get its costs down is because they have a no-growth business model in a seniority based system where labor costs are only going to rise. UA’s costs cannot go down outside of another bankruptcy.

We have a no-growth business model? Really? Can you please provide me the link to the business model you're looking at or basing those conclusions on? I have UAL's public bankruptcy exit plan sitting right here on my desk but I'm not seeing the "no growth" part. Could you please provide specific numbers and their source? Or are you talking in platitudes again?


I know what is happening at UA is your worst nightmare but it’s also exactly what I predicted would happen.

World, you don't really predict anything. You just really, really love Delta Airlines. You also really, really don't love United Airlines. So you say all kinds of wonderful things about Delta, and when something good happens at Delta, you say "I told you so." Then you write bad things about UAL. When something "bad" (or "bad" in your opinion) happens at UAL, you say you predicted that too. I guess using your logic, for example, if I really hate the color red, I could go to Vegas, walk up to the roulette table, place some chips on black, have black sometimes come up on the wheel, and then say, "I predicted it."

Other analysts are saying exactly what I’ve been saying: UA’s fundamentals are abysmal right now but UA can get by because there is enough decent paying business to be had.

You've said this before too. Could you do us a favor World and stop elevating yourself to the level of a professional analyst? Sorry World, I'm not trying to "be mean" to you but you're just some dude on a message board and that's about it. I had to explain to you last month how to do something as rudimentary as stage length adjust average CASM's so that one can make credible comparisons between carriers. So when some other guy on a message board, like me, has to explain that to you, it kind of makes many of your observations a little less credible. Honestly WT, I'm not trying to make fun of you at all, but you are no analyst or anything close, so stop elevating yourself to that level.


The next bankruptcy will not be as nice to UA.

You've made this statement several times. I think you even prefixed it with "Mark my words...." Again, someone with your depth of intelligence (your words) would understand that a statement like that, unless it was just made in anger or to arouse emotion, requires much analysis of complex numbers. Certainly, you would have those numbers at hand before you would make such a statement. Could you please provide, quarter by quarter, UAL's expected revenues, costs, and cash flow between now and whatever time in the future UAL is expected to enter bankruptcy? Within 5 years, right? You said in an older post that UAL would be in bankruptcy within five years, so I'd be particularly interested in the quarter in which cash flow turns negative and we start burning through our 5B in cash. Using your "prediction," I think we're going to have start burning through about a billion bucks a year pretty soon in order to meet your predicted timeline. Again, I'm a numbers guy at heart so I'm anxiously awaiting that analysis. I want to know when I should seriously start shorting UA stock when those 1B/year cash burns start happening.

In conclusion, spare me a response like, "What have you ever contributed to these boards," or, "I'm a bitter UAL employee," etc., etc. Just provide us the numbers you're basing UAL's impending bankruptcy upon, a link to our no growth business model you referred to, and the several quarters' worth of costs/revenues for the network carriers and we can go from there. Thanks.
 


Quite the Head-Case, isn't he, forgive him, he has no life, he's hysterical, just like D has no route system nor management and hysterical, UAL/CAL or CAL/UAL does on both accounts with great calm, not to mention the backing of GE,MORGAN,BOEING,ETC.,. Look for something very special in the relative near future, just as DAL can expect, something very special in the same time... ;)

Sadly the bar has been lowered, and man they are out there, they're definitely out there.... :p
 
Actually I think Cosomo should challenge WT to a duel on the grounds of bemsmirching (sorry JB Guppy, I am too lazy to use 10 words when this one fits nicely :)) his good name. Ualdriver could second him and, well, not quite sure who could second WT! With phrases such "getting desperate" I have noticed a not-so-subtle shift from speaking to the points to speaking to the person - always a grave error in disputation and debate unless it is meant in a witty manner such as Sir Winston's telling a female dinner guest that no, he did not contest the 'fact' that he was drunk, but that the 'fact' also stood that she was ugly and that in the morning he would be sober.
Sorry WT. I obviously cannot marshall the financial data with the skill of Cosmo to make a purely analytical judgement, but if I were to judge this round on the presentation of the data, I have have to hand the point to him as he has deftly lured you from speaking to the points.
For those keeping tally at home. I would humbly submit:

Round 1: Cosmo 1, WT 0


Cheers
 
I'm obviously helping sell some blood pressure medicine this weekend. I guess some folks at UA are feeling a tad vulnerable.

I'm pretty certain that I'll have the last laugh.... when UA files for bankruptcy yet again and their coveted network is dismantled.

The numbers are there for you and everyone else to see. I can't help you if you are in denial.
 
every US network carrier has been in C11 so that is obviously not a meaningful distinction. What is meaningful is that DL in just 9 months in bankruptcy has reached operating profit margins double what UA posted (DL posted a 10%+ profit margin in June and July); UA hasn't posted anything close to that kind of margin since 1999.

Analysts had very positive comments about DL... not so about UA or CO. If I'm so far off the deep end, then why are the analysts saying such negative things about UA, whose stock dropped 20% in the 2nd quarter?
 
"every US network carrier has been in C11 so that is obviously not a meaningful distinction."

WT, are you sure about that? Last time I checked, AA has yet to visit the courthouse.

Let's all get one thing clear. Glenn Tilton has no desire to run UA for the long haul. He continues to shop UA around as a partner in M & A activity. Doing so would prop up UA's stock price for the short-term, and he and his joke of a management team would stand to make a lot of money cashing in their options. Tilton was hired to get UA through bankruptcy, not to run the company for the long haul.
 
WT has had ONE desire this entire time....a DL acquisition of UAL. He spent our stint in Ch 11 informing us that there was almost no chance of emerging from bk as a stand alone carrier, if we survived at all. Now that the shoe hopped onto the other foot, he talks about Delta's world domination as if anyone who doesn't recognize that must be dense. Blah, blah, blah. Ignore him.

Remember, this guy is a mere customer.......talk about an obsessive, panic-driven personality type! Imagine stalking message boards in the sales of automobiles (or any other field) and continually boasting that Volkswagon is going to take over the world. He belongs on the 'pros and cons of Xanax' board, not here.
 
WT:

I'm afraid I have to agree with Ukridge. Score 1 for Cosmos and 0 for WT. If you are going to go head-to-head with Cosmos, then produce the numbers and argue the fact like he does. It might require alot of research time on your part. And, Oh My, relying of what the analysts say is like relying on the news put forth in the major media!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top