And the BK result was so much better?
No one lost retiree medical this was a lie spread by many misinformed officers in their cheesy videos. Those 50 and over would have continued with their existing funding option, those under 50 would have paid for retiree medical with a new higher cap SK bank, and those from 45 up to 50 would have had a more SK time added based on a formula. Now you have nothing under the new and improved BK CBA.
So we voted down the cost neutral CBA for a cost reduction CBA forced on us in BK. Voting no didn't really improve things did it?
Was AA going to file BK if we settled in 2010? BK, unless the economy improved significantly, was probably inevitable after most of our peers filed BK.
Hey maybe we should have rolled the dice in BK court back in 2003 and got that killer deal UA got right?