PlayTheOdds said:
Simply my opinion. If AMFA doesn't pull a rabbit out of its hat it will not be able to effectivly represent its members at the other carriers. AMFAs success was its hardball tactics, without them AMFA is useless because they have no other negotiating skills. Northwest has effectivly shown the industry how to deal with hard ball unions so the strike threat is mute for all unions. They are going to have to develop new strategies soon or campanies will begin to walk all over them.
[post="310471"][/post]
"Compaines walk all over them"???
Wouldn't caving to a demand of a 26% paycut along with 50% membership lay-off constitute "walking all over them"?
Doesn't industry leading concessions at AA by the TWU "without membership ratification" constitute "walking all over them"?
I am sick of your rhetoric PTO, why don't you lay out some specifics about what the mechanics in the indsutry should do that will make the profession worthy of working in and will sustain the long term future of the profession?
Should we all become scabs or anti-union like you?
I worked in another industry like that, and when the older workers became less productive and made more per hour, the companues just "walked all over them" and sent them home, replacing them with more productive younger workers making less money. There is no seniority system once the unions fail.
I have yet to see you offer a long term viable solution that will benefit the working man and the profession, all I see you offer is individual "I've got mine" working mentality. That will lead to "walking all over them" worse than you see today.
You seperate AMFA from the member and keep calling AMFA "they". You still don't get it no matter how many times it is said...
"AMFA is the membership, AMFA is not seperate from the member, the MEMBERS at Northwest voted to strike, and given the small number of membership crossing to scab, it is obvious the Northwest Mechanics decided how to handle this situation.