Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree that if there is going to be a reduction in force, that management should be reduced equally with labor.Checking it Out said:Buck AA asked the International to submit names of management of areas they believed were over staffed. In turn the International requestd the locals to supply the information. This was done and Randy had the letter posted for everyone to see. Than it was removed. during the normal procedures.
I believe with the automation AA is doing, we need fewer bosses. As you are aware to many directing can cause problem. Why have 5 supervisors for 120 employees? Or 1 manager for 250 employees or 1 dock.
Shared Sacrafice needs to be distributed fairly. As it stands Management in M&E has not been hit as hard as other departments and needs to be corrected.
Checking it Out said:I agree that if there is going to be a reduction in force, that management should be reduced equally with labor.
I agree.
So the Executive Board of Local 514 was completely behind Randy is this procedure?
The Executive Board supports the Internationals efforts to insure Management shares in the shared sacrafice and be treated fairly. AA like's to compare SW management with ours but they seem to forget the percentages are distorted, SW operate's differently in M&E.
And what about wages and benefits? Are they too being looked at?
All I know is what is on the International web site.
Did management share equally in the sacrifice as our OSM brothers and sisters and those RIF'd to those positions?
I agree the OSM's took a larger pay reduction. As you are aware the jobs their performing is being done at a lower pay at Timco or Sasco. So we will have a hard road to find a happy medium to benifit eveyone in the long term.
Lets hope that the OSM's are not forgotten. The OSM shared a little more than the senior union members.
I agree, We also need to keep in mind the high cost of living areas need to be looked at. And an adjustment needs to be looked at during the next contract talks.
It is also my understanding that this document was never posted in BU 3&4?
This is correct, each area has an officer assigned to post. If he/she is absent, it does get overlooked once in a while. We do have many volunteers who will post as necessary when asked. I like the fact that we have a lot more interest this go around in the local elections and hope many will stay involved. Unfortunately some will get their feelings hurt and go back and lick their wounds and complain about why they lost. I can't wait to hear the complaints about the voting being rigged and all the other false stories.
Why was this document removed so quickly?
I dont believe it was removed quickly, I do know some of the officers were asked to post other information and the boards do have limited space.
Feel free to contact Randy for additional information.
The Executive Board supports the Internationals efforts to insure Management shares in the shared sacrafice and be treated fairly. AA like's to compare SW management with ours but they seem to forget the percentages are distorted, SW operate's differently in M&E
the jobs their (OSM's) performing is being done at a lower pay at Timco or Sasco
You may not believe in everything the TWU does but what have you done to remove the TWU and or its structure from destroying the membership? All you do is talk and say that you make motions. Yet on these bulletin boards you blast anyone attempting change and praise everything the TWU does.Checking it Out said:Buck I don't believe in everything the TWU does and if you ask you will find out, I have made more motions from the floor than most. I do believe we need a more unified membership and believe the division has been caused by outside forces. This will be coming to an end shortly and I will be relieved.
As for COLA, I have not changed my opinion. If you go back, you will see my stance is the same. A 100,000 dollar house in Tulsa is 200,000 thousand in other areas. Is this fair? NO! Should we all suffer? No!
I believe we need to also eliminate the different pay progressions. But I also believe the majority has made a decision. Just like the Majority have chosen by not signing a card! The majority is the key in decision making and we ALL should be coming out together when the decision is decided. Unfortunately many times the minority screams and we are forced to make decisions based on this. Just like the low cost carriers are dictating the cost of a ticket now!
Outside forces?I do believe we need a more unified membership and believe the division has been caused by outside forces. This will be coming to an end shortly and I will be relieved.
Why do you believe that the different pay progressions need to be removed? You have and continue to support the TWU and it is the concessions negotiated by the TWU that have placed us where we are today, divided and conquered
Once again we hear management through TWU supporters.Nightwatch said:It is the concessions voted in by the membership of the TWU that give you the ability to retain your employment with AA. AMFA is divided and conquered, not the TWU.