- Aug 20, 2002
- 7,319
- 1,555
----------------
On 7/16/2003 8:29:33 PM Bob Owens wrote:
I have no problem with that, as long as you guys are willing to push for more, unfortunately you guys are always willing to settle for less. And you take the position that if its good enough for you, its good enough for us. Well its not.
Look if you guys want to make a NY based wage, thats fine by me, the problem is you guys force us in NY to live on a Tulsa based wage and get insulted when we try to push for more for us. Well we need more, if you guys are willing to settle for less then why do you object to us trying to get a livable wage for us?
----------------
Bob I want to make a NY based wage! How can this be acheived with TUL always willing to take concessions?On 7/16/2003 8:29:33 PM Bob Owens wrote:
----------------
On 7/15/2003 9:15:55 AM AAmech wrote:
Sure lets give mechanics in the "High Cost" areas more money. As long as Mechanics in "Hardship" areas like TUL also receive a premium!
----------------
On 7/15/2003 9:15:55 AM AAmech wrote:
Sure lets give mechanics in the "High Cost" areas more money. As long as Mechanics in "Hardship" areas like TUL also receive a premium!
----------------
I have no problem with that, as long as you guys are willing to push for more, unfortunately you guys are always willing to settle for less. And you take the position that if its good enough for you, its good enough for us. Well its not.
Look if you guys want to make a NY based wage, thats fine by me, the problem is you guys force us in NY to live on a Tulsa based wage and get insulted when we try to push for more for us. Well we need more, if you guys are willing to settle for less then why do you object to us trying to get a livable wage for us?
----------------