The First 100 Days

  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #46
View attachment 11649

Hypocrisy alert.

Let's here it from the crew about going around congress with EO's.

Only 4 more than Johnson and 5 more than Truman......what's your point?

World record for bypassing Congress is held by FDR, Hoover then the Woodman.

Bother to check what those 30 EO's were concerning and why he cut them?

Not all EO's are end arounds on Congress.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #47
Yep...we've tried the fence. It was just a fence, not a wall...it cost a lot of money...and it didn't work. Oh yeah....and Mexico wasn't paying for it - taxpayers were. There should be a new focus on it, but our coward in chief lacked the balls to even bring it up when talking to the president of Mexico.

Duh....was never finished.
 
Only 4 more than Johnson and 5 more than Truman......what's your point?

World record for bypassing Congress is held by FDR, Hoover then the Woodman.

Bother to check what those 30 EO's were concerning and why he cut them?

Not all EO's are end arounds on Congress.

I hope you stretch before you reach that far
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #50
I hope you stretch before you reach that far


watch
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #51
But the dear leader was talking about how easy this was all going to be. He was a deal maker...he was going to get things done. Seems like when the going gets tough, the tough go to Mar a Lago, Or just let things implode on their own. This guy talks tough. Real tough. Then...when faced when one of those 'big' issues changes his tune. Why...."who knew healthcare was so complicated?". Or who knew that North Korea was a little tougher to crack than this military prep school alumni thought it was.

But my favorite was and still is when the bloviator in Chief, who was telling his adoring masses during the campaign that we were going to build that wall and Mexico was going to pay for it. Now a wall along the border of your southern neighbor is a mighty big issue. Especially when they are expected to pay for it. And his supporters were eating this up...a wall....and THEY would pay for it!!! Gosh what a breath of fresh air. And then the dear leader finds himself sitting across the table from the President of Mexico and....not one single word about a wall. A bully and a coward was exposed at that moment. BUT...he wasn't Hillary and he wasn't Obama....so we really don't care.

Trump’s Border Wall Request Equals 0.035% of Federal Spending

border_wall-chart.jpg


http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...der-wall-request-equals-0035-federal-spending

DQOwM_s-200x150.gif
 
Well..where have YOU been...the reason it's so low is because he is planning on having Mexico pay for the wall....no need to put Muhrican funds towards it.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #53
Well..where have YOU been...the reason it's so low is because he is planning on having Mexico pay for the wall....no need to put Muhrican funds towards it.

With your logic, it shouldn't have been entered in the request then......but it was, whys that?

Hear of His entry tax?
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #54
Well..where have YOU been...the reason it's so low is because he is planning on having Mexico pay for the wall....no need to put Muhrican funds towards it.

He said he'd make them pay for it.......He said he'd make them pay for it.....He said he'd make them pay for it.....He said he'd make them pay for it.....

Did he say how?
 
He said he'd make them pay for it.......He said he'd make them pay for it.....He said he'd make them pay for it.....He said he'd make them pay for it.....

Did he say how?

Come to think of it, he didn't. His initial idea sounded a LOT like American companies would pay for it via his tariff. But those are American companies that pay a tariff....not the Mexican government.

But you bring up a good point...he hasn't really said how he was going to do anything. He was going to repeal and replace Obamacare with "something great". How'd that turn out?
 
Back
Top