OK I am back from running errands and will try to awnser point by point, enjoy!
Art -FACT-they are INCAPABLE of running an airline properly, and they continue to take steps which APPEAR to work, but in the long run cause more problems than they solve.
Up-Fact, They turned around a poor HP Airline, they have improved the Operations here. The did complete a merger smoother than any before. They have kept most everyone employed.
ART: The above statement proves you are wearing blinders. HP was ok as a regional airline, nothing more. The management team ( and I use that term loosely) does not have the scope or experience to run a major international airline the size of the new US and they have proven it repeatedly.
Oh--and they have not even come close to COMPLETING the merger, 3 years after the fact...in fact they have engendered infighting and anymosity between the east and west. So much for your theory.
Art-Yes others are implementing fees, and yes, they are unpopular with most of us, but in SOME cases they are an unwelcome necessity. In US' case they cross a line between need and greed however, and are an attempt to cover up for the ineptitude in running an airline.
Up-Say what? How is it “greed†trying to stay in business? “Crossed the line†oh please nothing but an emotional statement. They have done only two things that have yet to be matched ny others. The Soda charge and the elimination of the DM Bonus. In the grand scheme of things pretty small items IMHO and these may still be met by the other airlines. And what ineptitude are they covering up for and how would these changes “cover them up�
ART: There is no way that charging for soda and eliminating bonus miles is going to save the airline or keep it in business, regardless of the price of oil. That is a BS excuse. Again, they do not think things through. It is another penny wise and pound foolish move, showing they can step over dollars to pick up nickels. And these may be relatively small things to YOU but to the customer they are BIG, especially since NO other airline has matched, and our information (from reliable sources AT other airlines) is that they have no intention of doing so, but welcome the business of former US Elites.
Art-IF they had not made some of the draconian an ill informed changes they have made over the past couple of years,
Up-Again nothing more than an emotional rant, what draconian and ill informed changes?
ART: They cut staff further than they should have for the scope of the operation, causing lengthy delays and customer service issues. They introduced a sub par web site WELL before it was ready, and caused nightmares for customers trying to use it. They did not think the reservation system choice through, and took the CHEAP route, which wound up costing much more in the long run in unhappy customers, loss of goodwill, and operational breakdowns. Oh--and there IS a version of SHARES which works fine, not the stripped version that US has--and CO has it. Oh--and on that subject, up until a month ago, even US employees could not tell you where an inbound aircraft was coming from, while CO had that function readily available on their MOBILE web site MONTHS ago. That's just ONE example.
Art-IF they had not encouraged their most experienced personnel to leave, knowing that they would have inexperienced untrained people to replace them.
Up-Actually not sure what they have done to “Encourage’ experienced people to leave? Some change? Oh no we can’t deal with that? Ultimately not many “Older Experienced people have left or they CASM would not still be so high.
ART: There are far fewer long time employees left than there were even 2 years ago. Look at Chairmans--and INT res..it's been decimated...more than half of the old Chairmans Liaisons are gone. Senior agents took buyouts or just quit. These were people who, had they been retained, could have saved the company a fortune during the operational meltdowns, but all Tempe cares about is the pay rate....like most other corporate entities unfortunately. The percentage of employees who feel somewhat EMBARRASSED to come to work is higher at US than any other airline I know of.
Art-IF they had tried in GOOD FAITH to negotiate with the unions (not necessarily to give them more, but to gain efficiencies which are enjoyed by other airlines,
Up-Of coursed they tried in good faith to negotiate, it is in their best interest to get deals done, that is what companies do. They have reached agreements with almost all of the unions I would suggest the ones they haven’t might need to look in the mirror. You can’t even blame the company completely negotiations are a two way street..
ART: They did not try to negotiate in good faith. If they had done so we would never have seen the likes of the East/West battle which is going on with the pilots. This alone could eventually be the downfall of the entire company. Is labor completely right here? Probably not, but neither is the company, and this COULD have been avoided.
Art-IF they had been honest with customers and employees alike,
Up-Is this your opinion or fact, what does that even mean? If they say one thing and then the environment dictates changes they are now liars?
ART: Has nothing to do with the environment. I have been lied to to my face by management, and they have said they would do things they never did. This is my own PERSONAL experience, and when added to the stories of other customers and employees, their credibility is in the toilet.
Art-IF they had chosen to give the employees the tools they need to do the job efficiently, and reduce the need for extra spending in the long run,
Up-No they chose to purposely not give the employees tools? Again another nonsensical statement. If your talking Shares that was done to save the company from another BL because the old system cost and contract where horrible. Fact they have spent a ton upgrading everything adding kiosk, equipment, improving the Aircraft
ART: Again--I refer to my previous statement-reducing staffing to levels incapable of properly running an operation--choosing a reservations system which was NOT properly tested, and was INCAPABLE of running an operation the scope of the new US, but was cheap...I won't argue that SHARES was a wrong choice, perhaps it was not, but the stripped down version they chose was and is completely inadequate to do the job, and has cost MILLIONS in fixes which could have been avoided.
Art-IF THEY KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING, they would be in a better position to weather the storm.
Up-Seems to me the are making smart, safe decisions to keep us all employed. We have all fared better then all the other legacy work groups. I am glad they are making the decisions and not you!
ART: There is nothing smart and safe about what they are doing--you should be ashamed of yourself for even saying that. You have NOT fared better than other legacy workgroups--you are the LOWEST paid and least respected by management of ANY other airline workgroup.
Art-So you can spout off all you want about $140 oil, and you're not wrong, but ONLY US Airways has launched a frontal attack on both customers and employees alike, and in the end they will get what they deserve.
Up-Really launched an attack? Come on Art 90% of your points are the same claptrap repeated 10 different ways! What attack? Yes thier plan is to kill off all the employees and customers, wow why didn’t I think of that!
ART: What a moronic statement! Not the same claptrap, fact. we have statements made by both Parker and Kirby showing their contempt for high yield elite customers, and the actions toward employees speaks for itself.
Art-NOTE--In my heart it hurts to see this happen because I have many friends still working at US Airways (yourself NOT included), but until there is REAL management who is willing to take risks and assume responsibility (and blame) for their mistakes, there is not a chance.
Art-NO OTHER AIRLINE in the US is even considering charging for soft drinks.
Up-How do you know they are not considering it? I’ll bet you they are I will also bet you that if none follow we won’t do it for to long. That is how the market works.
ART: Do you really think US management is the only management team we speak to? I won't say any more.....I can't violate confidentiality, but there is truth in what I say.
Art-NO OTHER AIRLINE in the US has as yet canceled bonus miles for Elites--and my information is they are NOT even thinking of it.
ART: No response there......because there is nothing you can say.
Art-NO OTHER AIRLINE in the US except United has matched the elimination of the 500 mile minimum, and we have heard that even UA is reconsidering.
Up-Are any of these really a deal breaker? Go read Flyer talk on the OALs they all have things going on that nobody likes!
ART: Yes for many frequent fliers they are a deal breaker. I have had HUNDREDS of requests for status matches to other airlines in the past two weeks, and MANY have gone...representing a few million in lost revenue for US.
Art-NO OTHER AIRLINE has such contempt for both customers and employees as does US.
Up-Deleted by Moderator)
ART: Language, Language--the truth hurts doesn't it???
I see little facts or objectivity in any of your points ART!
ART: I am emotional and passionate about what I believe in, but if you can't see the truth in what I am saying then you are truly blind-or ignorant...or both.....
I am going no further with this because I unlike you I don't want a time out.
Have a safe and enjoyable 4th everyone.