allunionsdeceive
Senior
- Dec 7, 2005
- 286
- 0
Two questions:According to the NMB a change in representation does not change the CBA.
Cases:
Amfa wins at UAL and NWA, only adminsters the old IAM CBA.
PFAA wins at NWA over ibt, only administers the ibt FA CBA.
Amfa wins at WN over ibt, only amdminsters the ibt CBA.
None of these contracts were opened upon a change of representation, only when the amendable dates came due were Section 6 negotiations stared.
In any of the cases above where any contracts under negotiation at the time they changed representations? Where any involved in a merger?
In your travels have you found any case that meets the case that we have at AWA/US?PSA was ibt and US was IAM, single carrier status declared the PSA mechanic and related were transitioned into the US CBA.
Just as it will happen no matter who wins if there is an election.
That is they the company has ceased section 6 negotiations with the ibt.
And to BD:
Just because you bold it and use a bigger font does not make it correct in what you write.
No matter what happens the IAM/US CBA will be the surviving CBA per single carrier status.
Inferior?
Compare scope, stock clerks and gse wages.