FutureUScapt
Veteran
- Dec 1, 2005
- 600
- 13
Or AS, HA, VX, F9, B6, FL...
Jim
Because AS, HA, and VX have a desire for within-perimeter slots?
And it's unclear to me if F9 would've qualified because the parent company, Republic Airways, effectively has a codeshare agreement with US, an airline with more than 5% of the slots. Supposing that weren't an issue, F9 desire would be rather limited seeing that one of their main hubs is beyond the perimeter.
This was all about getting B6 and/or WN into DCA, and evidently B6 getting access to the market was still insufficient as it didn't solve the "market share concerns." Sigh...
The DOT has long held that BWI and DCA/IAD are separate markets, citing WN/FL's presence at BWI as not affecting fares at Washington much if any
True, but "DCA/IAD" can either be counted as one market or two, depending on whatever situation best suits the DOT's argument.
Back in 2000, UA/US would've been required to divest DCA slots because they would've been too dominant in Washington DC (DCA and IAD treated as one market).
Fast forward to the DL/US proposed slot swap in 2009 and the fact that UA maintains a large hub at IAD is now meaningless as US would've become too dominant at DCA (DCA and IAD now considered as separate markets).