She's in trouble

[delldude]

What would Pam say about that?

She's in the laundry.....

 

[local 12 proud]

I guess you all never heard of Margaret Thatcher and Golda Meir.

There is nothing wrong with a woman being in charge of the government.

Men have run this country for over 200 years and we are in bad shape.

Even the leader of Germany is a woman.

Hillary is no Thatcher, Meir, Merkel...not even a Bhutto!

cackle

 

[700UW]

How can she be yet, she is just a Senator, not the President, she hasnt had the opportunity yet.

 

[local 12 proud]

How can she be yet, she is just a Senator, not the President, she hasnt had the opportunity yet.

Lack of integrity, and her track record speaks volumes!

 

[700UW]

Go read the IAM thread, your republicans are way worse.

Funny under Bill we eliminated the decifit and had a surplus, economy was great, things are far worse now since Bush took over.

 

[delldude]

How can she be yet, she is just a Senator, not the President, she hasnt had the opportunity yet.

And there you go proving her lack of experience.

 

[700UW]

Well has any other candidate been the spouse of the President and been involved with running the country?

Laura Bush has done nothing compared to what Hillary tried to accomplish we would have national healthcare if it wasnt for the insurance companies spending millions to brainwash people that it would be a bad idea.

 

[local 12 proud]

Well has any other candidate been the spouse of the President and been involved with running the country?

Evidently she can't even satisfy her husbands needs, how is she going to satisfy ours?

Laura Bush has done nothing compared to what Hillary tried to accomplish we would have national healthcare if it wasnt for the insurance companies spending millions to brainwash people that it would be a bad idea.

National Healthcare would be a disaster!

You want free treatment then head on down to your local county hospital for that superior
gov'ment care.

 

[local 12 proud]

Hey Bears, got that Champagne on ice....

Whooops there it is

 

[700UW]

How would national healthcare be a disaster?

Seems to work fine in Canada and Europe.

I guess in your eyes it is better to let a senior citizen choose between eating and buying meds.

I guess it is ok for kids and adults to be sick and die cause they have no healthcare.

I will give you a true strory:

My son's cousin on his mother's side, she was 23 years old and had no healthcare, came down with thyroid cancer, could not seek treatment as she was uninsured. Before she could go and see the specialist she had to pay $23,000 for her to be seen and treated.

She did not qualify for government assistance.

Her parents had to take out a second mortgage and they had to rely on donations and fund raisers otherwise she would have died.

Those types of stories are very common in the US, so in your eyes it would be ok for a 23 year old female to die, instead of paying a 3% payroll tax to fund universal healthcare?

In 2005 46.6 million had no healthcare coverage and the # increases every year.

In 2006 the numbers increased to over 50 million uninsured.

Last year over 21,000 Americans died due to no health insurance.

But hey you dont care.

Appranently you cant comprehend, to fund universal healthcare in the US every employed person would pay a 3% tax on their salary.

Nothing would be free, you would still have copays and out of pocket expenses.

 

[Dan Webb]

How would national healthcare be a disaster?

Seems to work fine in Canada and Europe.

In Socialized Medicine, Everyone Is A Doctor [Investor's Business Daily]

The London Telegraph reported Tuesday that the British government has a "plan to save billions of pounds from the NHS budget." But it won't come without enormous pain.

"Instead of going to a hospital or consulting a doctor, patients will be encouraged to carry out 'self-care' as the Department of Health tries to meet Treasury targets to curb spending," the Telegraph explained.

Lots more from where that came from if you want it...

 

[Gilding the Lily]

Those types of stories are very common in the US, so in your eyes it would be ok for a 23 year old female to die, instead of paying a 3% payroll tax to fund universal healthcare?

This is a joke right? You think it would only be 3%? Are your premiums now only 3%? I would venture a guess that premiums right now are more than 3% of the average joe's payroll cost. And just think how much more that percentage will rise once the bureaucracy machine -- err government -- takes over. And how much more it will rise once Americans start abusing the essentially free healthcare system because they are going to the doctor for everything, whether necessary or not.

 

[Gilding the Lily]

700UW,


Unfortunately for you (and Hillary), it looks like she has lost everything that could even remotely be considered a lead.

"A new CNN/WMUR New Hampshire presidential primary poll conducted by the University of New Hampshire has Senators Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois all tied up, with each grabbing the support of 33 percent of likely Democratic primary voters in the Granite State."


Dan Webb,

Is that your name... or are you borrowing it from the Superstar US attorney and defense counsel to Illinois' Governor Ryan on public corruption charges and racketeering?

 

[delldude]

How would national healthcare be a disaster?

Seems to work fine in Canada and Europe.

I guess in your eyes it is better to let a senior citizen choose between eating and buying meds.

I guess it is ok for kids and adults to be sick and die cause they have no healthcare.

I will give you a true strory:

My son's cousin on his mother's side, she was 23 years old and had no healthcare, came down with thyroid cancer, could not seek treatment as she was uninsured. Before she could go and see the specialist she had to pay $23,000 for her to be seen and treated.

She did not qualify for government assistance.

Her parents had to take out a second mortgage and they had to rely on donations and fund raisers otherwise she would have died.

Those types of stories are very common in the US, so in your eyes it would be ok for a 23 year old female to die, instead of paying a 3% payroll tax to fund universal healthcare?

In 2005 46.6 million had no healthcare coverage and the # increases every year.

In 2006 the numbers increased to over 50 million uninsured.

Last year over 21,000 Americans died due to no health insurance.

But hey you dont care.

Appranently you cant comprehend, to fund universal healthcare in the US every employed person would pay a 3% tax on their salary.

Nothing would be free, you would still have copays and out of pocket expenses.

See thats whats wrong here....you went to the same labor training college that I did....you did go further than I...no question...but one thing we both learned from studying labor history was healthcare was an employer offered benefit which was to entice workers from one company to another and it has survived to this point in time and now you Dem's feel its some type of entitlement program that you Dem's so dearly like to sell.I want the government to pay my auto insurance.....
This is the whole dilemma with the American culture......no wonder big business wants out,they never intended an entitlement......if you can't afford auto insurance...don't drive...if you can't afford heath insurance....why is it necessarily Sams dilemma?

Last year over 21,000 Americans died due to no health insurance.

So how many Polar bears and dogs died too? This is BS.
How many DWI died?
How many Homicides?
How many AIDS?
How many died due to malpractice?
How many died crossing the street?

 

[700UW]

My source was the National Insitute of Health.

And do you think it is ok for companies to rake in millions and our government waste billions on foriegn aid and we have uninsured Americans?

Do you know the highest percentage of employed workers on government provided healthcare are Wal-Mart employees.

And right now it costs the government 1% to run Social Security, if they privatized it the cost would run over 10%.