CSAR GYRENE
Veteran
Back in the Corps, "Salty" is considered quite the compliment, so pour away!I intend to pour a lot more salt on you,PTO. Salt gets rid of scabby "SLUGS" very well.
****fighting with a Marine is like wrestling with a pig...your both gonna get muddy, but the pig loves it!"***
Wow...VERY well said. Who ever you are fin, your grasp of economics far exceeds most on this boards capability to comprehend. The irony is that most of this is basic econ 101, that used to be taught in 9th grade civics.This sounds a little counterintuitive to me. If AMFA would have succeeded and not given up their jobs to replacements, then OSVs would not have had any attrition problems, and they would have had no reason to increase their wages. The fact that NWA mechanics would have been paid just a little less, and not a lot less than before would have been irrelevant since the supply was unchanged.
In contrast, you could reasonably argue that this strike actually raised the wages of all remainining contract work, since it caused an immediate drop in supply of contract workers accross the industry, thus forcing those employers to raise their wages to maintain an adequate workforce. I would presume that those like PTO did themselves a huge favor by taking this work, and at the same time, boosting the wages of the contract shops that they may ultimately go back to.
For your logic to be accepted, you'll have to explain why a contract shop would boost their wages as a result of NWA mechanics taking a 10% cut rather than a 25% cut. It's not like there would be any open positions that the contract shop would lose to NWA, so attrition due to workers seeking those higher wages would not be the driver. If you can't logically explain how this would happen at a micro level, then your argument falls flat on its face.