robbedagain
Veteran
- Oct 13, 2003
- 11,125
- 2,676
is that due to who was running the show--Lorenzo vs Stealin? i know its twoo differnt time periods with EAL being 91 and NW being 2005. but almost the same tatics being used?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No kidding robbed! Animosity is the natural state between labor and management. It was a state of all out war between NWA management and AMFA- just like the EAL/IAM situation years ago. The difference is the IAM/EAL picket line held solid to the end ensuring an IAM victory over EAL management as to where the AMFA picket line collapsed after only 4 months ensuring a NWA management victory.
good point too bad that didnt happen at nwa wonder how old stealing dougie would have handled thatHey, close but no cigar. Let's compare apples to apples. At EAL, the IAM did go out - but let's not forget the pilots walked too! The EAL pilots were true unionists. Can we say that about the APLA & IAM people at NWA? :down:
Your right, the pilots and F/As did honor the strike at the beginning. However after a while, the pilots got weak in the knees and went back in and the flight attendants followed. EAL was half it's original size at strike time thus making it easier for them to hire pilot and F/A replacements. I can still remember the words of the EAL ALPA MEC president followed by many pilots running back in. What really hurt EAL during the strike was that they had to replace ALL it's AMTs- line and heavy overhaul. They had to cannibalize aircraft for parts because they unable to repair those parts. I can remember about 10 L-10-11s sitting in MIA with all 3 engines missing; what a beautiful sight it was. The also had problems regarding 757 avionics; they had to cannibalize 757s in order to get the working parts. In fact, I knew an avionics AMT who worked mostly on the 757s and EAL management called him and begged him to cross because they were so desperate; he refused to cross.Hey, close but no cigar. Let's compare apples to apples. At EAL, the IAM did go out - but let's not forget the pilots walked too! The EAL pilots were true unionists. Can we say that about the APLA & IAM people at NWA? :down:
AMFA claimed that they did not need anybody else; so the other groups going to work was irrelevant. It is clearly documented that they believed their strength was in their skills, not numbers. They believed that by withdrawing their skills (strike) that they would bring NWA to it's knees. The IAM never claimed a "go it alone" mentality.Hey, close but no cigar. Let's compare apples to apples. At EAL, the IAM did go out - but let's not forget the pilots walked too! The EAL pilots were true unionists. Can we say that about the APLA & IAM people at NWA? :down:
AMFA never claimed "they wanted to go it alone". If you have proof they stated that (AMFA National) please post it. That's the iam scab union false claim after they lost the AMT's at the former NWA. AMFA simply wanted to organize the AMT's of the industry, and they do believe in strenth in skill. We can all see for ourselves how far the industrial unions "strength in numbers" paper tiger has worked.AMFA claimed that they did not need anybody else; so the other groups going to work was irrelevant. It is clearly documented that they believed their strength was in their skills, not numbers. They believed that by withdrawing their skills (strike) that they would bring NWA to it's knees. The IAM never claimed a "go it alone" mentality.
AMFA never claimed "they wanted to go it alone". If you have proof they stated that (AMFA National) please post it.
.... AMFA simply wanted to organize the AMT's of the industry, and they do believe in strenth in skill. We can all see for ourselves how far the industrial unions "strength in numbers" paper tiger has worked.
Yeah, I remember seeing Phil Bakes on a TV news story pleading the pilots to come back. They may have got weak knees and it was the IAM's strike - but they did honor it.Your right, the pilots and F/As did honor the strike at the beginning. However after a while, the pilots got weak in the knees and went back in and the flight attendants followed. EAL was half it's original size at strike time thus making it easier for them to hire pilot and F/A replacements. I can still remember the words of the EAL ALPA MEC president followed by many pilots running back in. What really hurt EAL during the strike was that they had to replace ALL it's AMTs- line and heavy overhaul. They had to cannibalize aircraft for parts because they unable to repair those parts. I can remember about 10 L-10-11s sitting in MIA with all 3 engines missing; what a beautiful sight it was. The also had problems regarding 757 avionics; they had to cannibalize 757s in order to get the working parts. In fact, I knew an avionics AMT who worked mostly on the 757s and EAL management called him and begged him to cross because they were so desperate; he refused to cross.
At NW, they had already farmed out most of heavy mx and laid almost half it's workforce before the strike even began. This made it easier for NW management to replace those who were left. All they basically had to do was get enough A&Ps to staff line mx MSP and DTW.
One more thought on "unionism". During the EAL strike, instead of supporting the strikers, the unions/employees at the other airlines did nothing. In fact, they were salivating at the prospect that their airlines would pick up EALs assets thus ensuring advancement for themselves; especially the pilots. While their EAL brothers were fighting to keep the wages up (it was clear to EAL ALPA that Lorenzo was going to screw them and bring them to CO pilot wages), the pilots at the other carriers were talking about how their careers would benefit from the demise of EAL. DL got some of the L-10-11s and 727s along with many of EAL ATL gates insuring more flying and high paying captain positions. Same with AA regarding the Latin American routes. So while the concept of unionism looks good on paper, nowadays it is no longer practiced; EAL was the last time it was.
WOW! It is so nice to hear from you once again Hackman. What a delightful surprise. Did you come up with the insults all by yourself or did you recruit a second grader to help?Yap, yap, yap.... flap, flap, flap.... go the worthless playthecods nonsensical scab gums. You run your mouth like a little f'ing toy poodle who hides behind her mommy's dress when corporate security isn't near by.
Your right about one thing, my NWA AMFA brothers did have nerve and courage ...
You are right about one thing clown, you did not have any business being a bootlicking scab at Dougie's Airline disaster.
BTW, how long was the DC-9 engine change??? I rest my case.
Let's set one thing straight stupid. I have nothing against honorable competent MRO mechanics. I have MRO AMT friends that are very good at what they do...
...You have assisted rogue management in bringing everyone further down in our skill, yourself included ( I do use that "skill" term very loosely for morons like you)...
You'll never lead any of the "poor MRO contract folks" out of the hole you helped dig. No scab ever will. Not even a little.
Now that I've wasted 20 minutes on your disgusting scab carcass again, I will finish with this. If and when any AA job action comes down the pike, (doubt it with the worthless twu) you make sure you speak up as the first dumb*ss fool in the scab line and shout; "I'm the scab PlaytheCooods!!!!!!", "I'm the scab PlaytheCooods!!!!". Real loud so we can hear you. Yeah.....right. :unsure: h34r: :unsure: h34r:
as i recall the dc9 engine change was a 2 day thing because of one thing: A LACK OF QUALIFIED MECHANICS. A real mechanic, such as prior to aug 2005, would of had it done in a few hrs or so.
robbed, I honestly believe that if you gave a deaf and dumb monkey from some obscure country (like the one you are from) a wrench, screwdriver and the opportunity to pay union dues that you would consider him a "real qualified mechanic".