PITbull
Veteran
- Dec 29, 2002
- 7,784
- 456
Bob,
Yes, you and I are definitely polarized on this issue. We shared viewpoints in previous posts on the merits and disadvantages of DPP.
In the late 70s and 80s the steel mill industry was in peril, and some co.s didn't make it. DPP were terminated, and I know I don't need to give you a history lesson. You could most definitely give it to me. However, there are companies that still have a DPP and went into BK and emerged with the pension benefit intact. Teachers, police offiers, firemen, some retail industries, state workers have a defined plan. Approx. 44 Million Americans have a defined plan. Folks that have a DPP also participate in a 401K plan if they can afford to. What's great about the DP monies are pretty much guaranteed at retirement, if you never could afford to have a 401k. But still not enough to retire on, as medical costs and long term care for the elderly is enormous. With that anticipation, folks generally try and fund a 401K too. But, like anything in life, there are no guarantees. No guarantees for Social Security either, we just hope it will still be there when we retire. If you have all three, it makes for a fairly secure retirement existence, even if one part of that equation fails.
I am not trying to convince you Bob of this view point. I am just sharing with folks why I can conceive of a DPP, rather than any other plan.[img I wonder if RSA would think that Corporate America should move away from the DPP. That would be an interesting take.src='http://www.usaviation.com/idealbb/images/smilies/5.gif'] Employees can choose to augment their retirement plans with other investing vehicles, but to eliminate DPP so a company execs can profit by receiving more stock options as perks, and showing that profit to drive their given stock up, I will not agree.
Yes, you and I are definitely polarized on this issue. We shared viewpoints in previous posts on the merits and disadvantages of DPP.
In the late 70s and 80s the steel mill industry was in peril, and some co.s didn't make it. DPP were terminated, and I know I don't need to give you a history lesson. You could most definitely give it to me. However, there are companies that still have a DPP and went into BK and emerged with the pension benefit intact. Teachers, police offiers, firemen, some retail industries, state workers have a defined plan. Approx. 44 Million Americans have a defined plan. Folks that have a DPP also participate in a 401K plan if they can afford to. What's great about the DP monies are pretty much guaranteed at retirement, if you never could afford to have a 401k. But still not enough to retire on, as medical costs and long term care for the elderly is enormous. With that anticipation, folks generally try and fund a 401K too. But, like anything in life, there are no guarantees. No guarantees for Social Security either, we just hope it will still be there when we retire. If you have all three, it makes for a fairly secure retirement existence, even if one part of that equation fails.
I am not trying to convince you Bob of this view point. I am just sharing with folks why I can conceive of a DPP, rather than any other plan.[img I wonder if RSA would think that Corporate America should move away from the DPP. That would be an interesting take.src='http://www.usaviation.com/idealbb/images/smilies/5.gif'] Employees can choose to augment their retirement plans with other investing vehicles, but to eliminate DPP so a company execs can profit by receiving more stock options as perks, and showing that profit to drive their given stock up, I will not agree.