Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its kind of like our IAM Pension. You can quit or retire and collect, but can not work again in the same industry. That one i don't get more than the PBGC determination.700UW said:So US will become a subsidiary of AAL Group, so you will still be working for US Airways.
Yeah, that's one thing about the IAM pension that isn't right. The union touts that as the best pension, but it is definitely lacking. It's good that they worked something for retirement into the transition agreement (for mx), but there should have been more options- like a pension or 401k match, or bothmike33 said:Its kind of like our IAM Pension. You can quit or retire and collect, but can not work again in the same industry. That one i don't get more than the PBGC determination.
FLYUSAIRWAYS said:Just got off the phone with the PBGC. They expect an answer regarding still working and start collecting our benefit because of the merger, in just a few days. They said the web site would be updated with the info, once the decesion was made. Since this will cost them big time, I expect A BIG FAT NO.
Good guess, but not anything "extra-legal." And, I don't think it has anything to do with the cost to the PBGC. As I understand it for the time being USAirways and American Airlines are to be "wholly-owned subsidiaries of AAL." That means that legally, you are still employed by US Airways and I am employed by American Airlines. With that distinction, US Airways has not ceased to exist; therefore, you are not eligible to start drawing from the pension in their care. So says the English major regarding the legal interpretation of the law.Just got off the phone with the PBGC. They expect an answer regarding still working and start collecting our benefit because of the merger, in just a few days. They said the web site would be updated with the info, once the decesion was made. Since this will cost them big time, I expect A BIG FAT NO.
Unfortunalely the light has turned to yellow on its way to red. We shall see soon enoughjimntx said:Good guess, but not anything "extra-legal." And, I don't think it has anything to do with the cost to the PBGC. As I understand it for the time being USAirways and American Airlines are to be "wholly-owned subsidiaries of AAL." That means that legally, you are still employed by US Airways and I am employed by American Airlines. With that distinction, US Airways has not ceased to exist; therefore, you are not eligible to start drawing from the pension in their care. So says the English major regarding the legal interpretation of the law.
usa1 said:
I think it all comes down to who's operating certificate is used. And I don't think that is clear yet. PBGC will have to wait and see.
Jimntx:
As I understand it for the time being USAirways and American Airlines are to be "wholly-owned subsidiaries of AAL." That means that legally, you are still employed by US Airways and I am employed by American Airlines. With that distinction, US Airways has not ceased to exist; therefore, you are not eligible to start drawing from the pension in their care.
Probably 18 months down the road both operations will be under one certificate. Odds are that it will be AA's. So, the light is still red - maybe in the future it wil turn green when all of US assets are under AA's roof.
Cheers.
I agree, we and the PBGC lawyers will have to wait 18-24 months for a single operating certificate to find out technically and legally who we work for.Probably 18 months down the road both operations will be under one certificate. Odds are that it will be AA's. So, the light is still red - maybe in the future it wil turn green when all of US assets are under AA's roof.
Cheers.