Obamacare Update!

MCI transplant said:
Come on Tree! ------ You know, and so does Obama, what's going on here! He's asking Obama for more material for his Law suit! ----- It's the old game of "I dare you!"! ----- Either if Obama is dumb enough, or smart enough, to take him up on it, only time will tell!
I disagree.  I think Boehner wants Obama to fix what he cannot get the House to do.  Besides, it's unlikely there will even be a law suit.  
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #77
Ms Tree said:
I disagree.  I think Boehner wants Obama to fix what he cannot get the House to do.  Besides, it's unlikely there will even be a law suit.  
Tree, what have I been talking about?------ Under the Constitution, Obama doesn't have the authority to "fix it"! Again that's what the Law suit is all about! As for if that Law Suit will in fact happen, I can't see any way around it! ------- But than again, who the hell am I?
 
Lazarus says the law suit will not fly.  Boehner and the House have no standing.  No standing no law suit.  Boehner knows this.  This is grand standing for the base,  Nothing more.
 
You would think if presidents do not have the authority to do what they have done that someone would have had standing and been able to successfully file a suit.  But no one has yet.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #79
Ms Tree said:
Lazarus says the law suit will not fly.  Boehner and the House have no standing.  No standing no law suit.  Boehner knows this.  This is grand standing for the base,  Nothing more.
 
You would think if presidents do not have the authority to do what they have done that someone would have had standing and been able to successfully file a suit.  But no one has yet.
Boehner has a whole House full of Lawyers who think he can! ( Now there's a pun for you!) We'll just have to wait and see, now won't we?-------- And I'm sure that if it goes through it will end up in the Supreme Court. I'm sure they would "Fast Track' it also.----- Obama hasn't done so well there lately either! But I believe we'll have a decision on the government substaties before that happens, which would derail obamcare anyway!   
 
They know perfectly well he/they have no standing. Just as the group in CA had no standing to contest the Prop 8 ruling. It's grand standing for the base. Now they can say 'Hey, we tried.'
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #81
Ms Tree said:
They know perfectly well he/they have no standing. Just as the group in CA had no standing to contest the Prop 8 ruling. It's grand standing for the base. Now they can say 'Hey, we tried.'
Hey tree, you maybe right! Let's just wait and see! ------ It would seem someone is taking it seriously, otherwise we wouldn't even be having this debate!
 
Just because it is being spoken about in the new cycle does not mean it's being taken seriously.
 
Ms Tree said:
Someone should have sued Bush when he did it but strangely not a single republican did.  Odd.  Very odd.
 
According to Simon Lazarus you may be waiting for your judical relief for quite some time.  In a nut shell, he argues that Boehner has no standing and the case (if filed) will be dismissed.
 
http://docs.house.gov/meetings/RU/RU00/20140716/102507/HMTG-113-RU00-Wstate-LazarusS-20140716.pdf
 
Old reliable Libtard standby.........."Bush" and "Racist"!
 
Ms Tree said:
And yet they do.  I am glad people are required to buy auto and medical insurance.  I have no interest in paying more than I have too for other peoples misfortune.
Not me! Auto insurance, for example is required in most states. The left pretends to "be a friend of the little guy" When who they are really friends with are the insurance companies and financial communities that bankroll their election.
 
You hear all of this bull feces about caring for the poor. Are Insurance premiums progressive like the Income tax? NO, they aren't so the "Little Guy" pays a higher portion of his meager wages to buy insurance and since many live in less then great areas their rates are higher.
 
Every policy I've ever bought has had an "Uninsured Motorist" charge. Let those who have assets to protect pay higher premiums and those who have no real asset other then the car they just totaled while you were texting and plowed into him make their own decisions. (It's called individual liberty)
 
If your net worth is negative or not higher then the value of the vehicle then auto insurance is a bad investment and a sure fire hardship.
 
southwind said:
Old reliable Libtard standby.........."Bush" and "Racist"!
Typical South. Throw stuff at the way and hope it sticks. Try addressing the issue.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #89
Ms Tree said:
Typical South. Throw stuff at the way and hope it sticks. Try addressing the issue.
How dare you Sir, disparage the South! ------ The South has a long and Honorable history in this country!!! It would abide well for you to use it as a guide towards any futher communications here!! ------- "Throw stuff at the way"???
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #90
Oh this one is good!!!------ Just for you Tree!  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Zy297Xgr8Q
 

Latest posts

Back
Top