Ms Tree
Veteran
- Jul 13, 2010
- 9,731
- 9,009
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let me ask you this? ------- What part of this document doesn't King Obama understand? ------- Article 1, section 1? http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/constitution/text.htmlMs Tree said:
Ms Tree said:
Forget Boehner! ------ Again, what part of the Constitution doesn't Obama understand? Laws are made by Congress! Not at the end of Obama's pen! The power to "Legislate" ( make laws) is given to Congress exclusively under the first Article, first section, of the Constitution. Not the Presidency! The job of interpreting those Laws is given to the Judicial Branch of the Government, again, not the Presidency! ----- His job is to enforce those Laws, and nothing else! He has given an oath to do so, but has chosen not only to rewrite them, but to ignore the ones he doesn't agree with!!!Ms Tree said:What part of Boehner telling Obama to take executive action are you unclear on? You are nothing if not predictable. When confronted with conflicting information, change direction.
And yet they do. I am glad people are required to buy auto and medical insurance. I have no interest in paying more than I have too for other peoples misfortune.SparrowHawk said:No government in the world has the right to force its Citizens to buy a product or service they do not desire. The fact that it may be in their best interest is of no consequence.
Individual Liberty includes the Creator given right to be stupid and along with that comes individual responsibility.
No! ----- Just the EO's that contradict the Constitution!!!Ms Tree said:Are all EO's illegal or just the ones you disagree with?
Boehner has everything to do with this. Boehner filed a law suit against Obama for EO's and now is telling Obama to issue EO's. Seems a bit contrary but hey, it is US politics.
Tree! --------That's what the House's Law suit is all about!!!Ms Tree said:Can you give an example of a EO that violates the COTUS?