Obama Scandals

[delldude]

Typical meaningless deflection.

Can you hear me now?

 

[Deleted member 17588]

Can you hear me now?

As before, this has no relevance (a deflection) on why you resurrected a six year old thread to post, without any context, a totally made up story from a satire website. I guessing you fell for the joke.

 

[delldude]

As before, this has no relevance (a deflection) on why you resurrected a six year old thread to post, without any context, a totally made up story from a satire website. I guessing you fell for the joke.

Keep guessing, Junior.....Thanks for playing

 

[Deleted member 17588]

Keep guessing, Junior.....Thanks for playing

I don't need to keep guessing because I know I was right first time. You shouldn't thank me for playing. You should thank me for calling attention to the fake information you were posting. That's beneficial to all of us. Hopefully to you, too!

 

[Insp4]

I don't need to keep guessing because I know I was right first time. You shouldn't thank me for playing. You should thank me for calling attention to the fake information you were posting. That's beneficial to all of us. Hopefully to you, too!

Oh really?

 

[Deleted member 17588]

Oh really?

Yeah. Anything else?

 

[Insp4]

Yeah. Anything else?

No!........ You seem to have it all figured out!

 

[Deleted member 17588]

No!........ You seem to have it all figured out!

Great! I'm glad we were able to discredit Delldude's ridiculous post.

 

[Insp4]

Great! I'm glad we were able to discredit Delldude's ridiculous post.

That's your take on it, not mine!

 

[Deleted member 17588]

That's your take on it, not mine!

I'm curious what your take is. You have the floor......

 

[delldude]

Great! I'm glad we were able to discredit Delldude's ridiculous post.

 

[Deleted member 17588]

It's unclear what message you're trying to convey. A coherent explanation would greatly benefit you to be better understood.

 

[Insp4]

Great! I'm glad we were able to discredit Delldude's ridiculous post.

You used the word "we", so who would you be referring to?

 

[delldude]

It's unclear what message you're trying to convey. A coherent explanation would greatly benefit you to be better understood.

Coherent or covalent?

 

[Deleted member 17588]

You used the word "we", so who would you be referring to?

I'm sorry. When you stated earlier that I had it all figured out, I mistakenly thought you were in agreement with me that Delldude's post was ridiculous satire. You still have the floor to explain your apparent opposition.